Search for: "State v. Quick"
Results 541 - 560
of 5,475
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2014, 11:23 am
The sections on what constitutes a search are updated with cases like United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 1:06 pm
A new Benghazi case: United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2015, 9:38 pm
Jingzhou Tao & Mariana Zhong, A quick read of the CIETAC arbitration rules 2015 Mark R. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 12:26 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 7:49 am
Quick Collect, Inc., Case No. 09-35183 (9th Cir. [read post]
26 Oct 2006, 6:49 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 4:58 am
The Child Poverty Action Group v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2010] UKSC 54 Just a quick note to confirm that the Supreme Court has unanimously upheld the Court of Appeal decision (reported here) that the Secretary of State cannot use common law claims to recover overpayments of social security benefits where the overpayment is by reason of acccident or error on the part of the benefit agency. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 4:58 am
The Child Poverty Action Group v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2010] UKSC 54 Just a quick note to confirm that the Supreme Court has unanimously upheld the Court of Appeal decision (reported here) that the Secretary of State cannot use common law claims to recover overpayments of social security benefits where the overpayment is by reason of acccident or error on the part of the benefit agency. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 1:07 pm
Garner and Scott v. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:41 am
Law v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 1:48 pm
By contrast, if a convention follows the ratification process under Article V, any change would require approval of thirty-eight state legislatures or state conventions. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 9:53 am
In any case, today’s pro se lawsuit, like numerous lawsuits preceding it, goes nowhere and gets a quick dismissal. [read post]
4 May 2017, 8:28 am
While passage of this legislative package won’t magically fix these challenges, it will provide quick relief for some of the ObamaCare expense and restrictions and expand the choices that Americans, American business, payers, providers and States while Congress works with American to identify and pursue legislative, regulatory, marketplace and other improvements. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 8:36 am
More SESTA/FOSTA-Related Posts: * 2H 2020 Quick Links, Part 4 (FOSTA) * Justice Thomas’ Anti-Section 230 Statement Doesn’t Support Reconsideration–JB v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 6:39 am
Koch v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:26 am
STATE V. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 6:57 am
Martono * 2H 2020 Quick Links, Part 4 (FOSTA) * Justice Thomas’ Anti-Section 230 Statement Doesn’t Support Reconsideration–JB v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 10:55 am
In Brown v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 6:00 am
With the Supreme Court’s grant of cert in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:42 am
A quick recap: last summer, Texas passed HB20, a #MAGA messaging bill that poses existential threats to the Internet as we know it. [read post]