Search for: "State v. Register"
Results 541 - 560
of 12,413
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2008, 9:10 pm
State v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 9:03 am
The Divisional Court had little difficulty in answering the case stated in the negative. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 7:38 pm
Maine Supreme CourtMAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of DecisionsDecision: 2007 ME 139Docket: Ken-06-757Argued: May 23, 2007Decided: September 25, 2007JOHN DOE v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 8:55 pm
In Mallory v. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 1:53 pm
This is a reminder that while Baze v. [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 1:53 pm
In Sociedad Agricola Santa Teresa Ltda. et al. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 3:52 pm
People v. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 12:18 am
Not for Publication United States District Court, S.D. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 1:49 pm
The motion to dismiss was predicated on our opinion in United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 12:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 May 2009, 11:25 am
Varieties protected by Plant Variety Protection (PVP) Title V can be sold only as a class of certified seed as will be designated by the individual states. [read post]
6 May 2009, 8:20 am
FloraPrima GmbH v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 12:15 pm
The United States Patent and Trademark Office has provided an update to its Examination Guidelines concerning the law of obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 in light of precedential decisions from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued since the 2007 decision by the United States Supreme Court in KSR Int’l Co. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 8:37 pm
As of earlier this year, the official count of registered medical marijuana users exceeded 1.1 million. [read post]
17 May 2011, 4:00 am
The case of the day, Mitchell v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 7:30 am
With its cert grant in Texas v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 3:00 am
The case of the day is Villoldo v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 4:43 pm
So when he announced in the New Haven Register that the case of State v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 9:49 am
United States [Cornell LII backgrounder, JURIST report] that the failure to register provision [18 USC § 2250] of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA) does not apply retroactively to offenses occurring before SORNA's enactment. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 11:49 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled 7-2 [opinion, PDF] Monday in Reynolds v. [read post]
