Search for: "State v. Singh"
Results 541 - 560
of 848
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2019, 8:00 am
The Court of Appeal had regard to the judgments in Pittalis v Grant (1989) QB 605, Rana v Ealing LBC (2018) EWCA Civ 2074, and Singh v Dass (2019) EWCA Civ 360 to find: there is no general rule that a case needs to be “exceptional” before a new point will be allowed to be taken on appeal. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 5:42 am
Farina, 13-1227, a state-on-top habeas case involving how much leeway a federal court is allowed in determining that a state court made an unreasonable factual determination; and Whitman v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 12:47 pm
Girdharilal Yadav (2004) 6 SCC 325; State of Maharashtra v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 12:40 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:53 am
India Former Army chief Gen V K Singh appeared before a Delhi court following summons against him in a criminal defamation case filed by Lt Gen(retd) Tejinder Singh (see our post on the case). [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 5:03 pm
On 7 February 2023, the Court of Appeal (Sharp P, Singh and Warby LJJ) heard an appeal in the case of Banks v Cadwalladr. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm
On 24 January 2012, HHJ Parkes QC heard an application in the case of Singh v Singh. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 12:31 pm
Justice Arnold stated that Defendants were service providers within the meaning of the 1988 Act as this question had already been settled in Dramatico v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 5:07 am
Singh Decl. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 4:22 pm
Dhirendra Singh Rajpurohit v. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 7:46 am
[See Mithu v. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 6:49 am
” For this blog, Tejinder Singh reviews Kavanaugh’s dissent in a challenge to the Affordable Care Act, Seven-Sky v. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 8:03 am
Holder, by Tejinder Singh, Goldstein & Russell, P.C. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 3:28 pm
(I covered one of those cases, United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 10:20 pm
As far as CGP is concerned, the Revenue relied on a Due Diligence report submitted by Ernst & Young in which it was stated that the parties had originally envisaged transferring Array Holdings Ltd. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm
[Disclaimer: Tejinder Singh of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, filed an amicus brief in support of the petitioner in Christeson.] [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:24 am
” At the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Timothy O’Neill discusses Timbs v. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 7:44 am
In Rameshwar S/o Kalyan Singh v. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 5:59 am
Prime Minister Singh recently announced he is for duty-free imports from all of Africa. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 11:39 pm
-Dallas 2012, no pet.); Singh v. [read post]
