Search for: "State v. Square" Results 541 - 560 of 6,573
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2023, 3:49 pm by Mukund Rathi
They are also expanding both qualified immunity, which often protects both state and federal officials from paying damages, as well as flawed doctrine from Monell v. [read post]
The US Department of Justice (DOJ) Tuesday filed a petition with the Supreme Court seeking a reversal of the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 7:57 am by Ronald Mann
ShareIt is fair to expect Wednesday’s arguments in Jack Daniel’s Properties v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:13 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard 8th March… [read post]
18 Mar 2023, 12:53 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
While the question was not squarely presented in this case, Judge Rao suggests that the D.C. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 8:06 am by Tobin Admin
Judge Cites “Troubling” Discovery Patterns United States District Judge Tilman E. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:44 am by Matrix Law
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard 8th March… [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
Although as was true with cases like United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 7:14 am by Alan J. Arville
However, such prescribing activities would be limited under the new rules to non-narcotic Schedule III-V controlled substances, a limitation not expressly included in the special registration provisions of the Ryan Haight Act. [read post]