Search for: "State v. Stark" Results 541 - 560 of 1,756
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2013, 12:57 pm by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Based in part on this assurance, the Supreme Court in February of this year dismissed the case, Clapper v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 1:54 pm by Marci Hill Jordan
Marci Hill Jordan is a Shareholder in Stark & Stark’s Marlton, New Jersey office, specializing in Workers’ Compensation Law. [read post]
’[10] This approach stands in stark contrast to the majority in Kiobel, who primarily rely on a misreading of footnote 20 to justify their misguided recourse to customary international law on the question of corporate liability. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 12:18 pm by familoo
However, caselaw confirms that welfare is still ‘a primary consideration’ (ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] 2 AC 166, [2011] UKSC 4), so it’s going to be a pretty important factor in any consideration of publication, and in many cases it will be determinative. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:01 am
The answer is complex, simply because it depends on: the actual compensation arrangement being proposed the application of federal law (including Stark and anti kickback rules) to the extent it applies and state law governing self-referral, fee-splitting, kickbacks, and patient brokering Federal law contains numerous exceptions to Stark and "safe harbors" under anti-kickback law. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 8:00 am
  So, again, maybe not the best comparison.Finally, I turned to the 2007 edition of O'Brien's and found Randie Stark v. [read post]