Search for: "State v. Suing" Results 541 - 560 of 29,973
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2015, 11:47 am
In Adaptive Spectrum and Signal Alignment Inc v British Telecommunications Plc [2013] EWHC 3768 (Pat) (3 Dec 2013) the claimant sued the defendant telecommunications company for infringing two of its European patents: EP 2,259,495 adaptive DSL margin and band control using historical operational data ("495"); and EP 1,869,790 DSL state and line profile control ("790"). [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 3:15 pm by Gene Quinn
Last week, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a decision in General Electric Co. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 10:11 am by J. Molinaro
Ford (“Plaintiff”) sued the State of Tennessee (“State”) regarding a motor vehicle accident that resulted in the death of Plaintiff’s daughter, Lynsey M. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:51 pm by John G. Papianou
  The irony is that defendants may find themselves the victims of their own success:  if plaintiffs give up suing in federal court and secure standing in state courts instead, defendants may wind up having to litigate nationwide classes in state courts. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Suing public officials and government entities for allegedly making defamatory statements concerning an individualBrummel v Board of Trustees of the Village of E. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 4:54 pm
The Michigan Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Adair v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 10:27 am
  Other times it is bankruptcy trustee v. attorney. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 3:03 pm
Today, according to mainstream news sources, 18 states have sued the EPA to act within 60 days. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 6:50 am by Eric Goldman
: Private Publishers Aren’t State Actors–Manhattan Community Access v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 8:27 am by Andres
They cite Lord Nicholls in Douglas v Hello 3 (OBG v Allan) as clearly stating that the concept of breach of confidence and misuse of private information “now covers two distinct causes of action”. [read post]