Search for: "State v. Trader"
Results 541 - 560
of 862
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2012, 2:27 pm
C.N. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 2:04 pm
It goes on to cite its own United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 7:50 am
Certification marks have been available at a national level in some member states (e.g. the UK, Germany) for a while, but the lack of EU-wide marks has led to inconsistent certification regimes/standards, and geographical gaps in certification. [read post]
17 May 2011, 11:14 pm
Sir Robin concluded his speech by criticizing the L'Oreal v Bellure decision (the AmeriKat agrees) and that this was an unfortunate development in trade mark law in Europe. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 2:53 am
Afshin Razi's physician's statement, dated August 27, 2009, which states that Dr. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
In the Anheuser-Busch case, the importation from the USA of bottled beer under the BUDWEISER mark for use and sale in US military and diplomatic establishments within the UK did not entitle the plaintiff to establish what Lord Oliver later stated was the first element of a passing off claim. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 8:11 am
Coca-Cola’s treatment in Canada v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
Chapter 293 President Greg Gilman stated in February that “a great many employees expressed concerns about being ‘on call’ 24/7. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 10:38 am
" The swap agreements in this case did not specifically state whether a material term of the instruments was based on a security. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 2:42 pm
The tax loss to the U.S., the lawyer said, was about $60,000.The case is United States of America v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 9:30 pm
In Hunter v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 6:44 am
Supreme Court recently ruled in Murray v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 5:00 am
Two Ropes & Gray LLP lawyers in New York went to prison for leaking tips to former Galleon Group LLC trader Zvi Goffer. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 10:13 pm
v=YZcyMgdWmPg. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 11:51 am
In Sasqua Group, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 11:00 am
La Barbera v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
SEC, 463 U.S. 646 (1983). [4] United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 1:12 pm
In Dirks v. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 11:22 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
8 May 2018, 6:37 am
Swap the non-distinctive words and add a house mark: not enough to avoid conflictWEALTHSMART v UBS SMARTWEALTH O/094/18 UK opposition (February 2018)For those involved in brand clearance, this is an illustration of the state of the Thomson Life principle in action before the UKIPO. [read post]
