Search for: "State v. Wales"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,632
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
Again, we see a different approach in England (and Wales). [read post]
26 Aug 2018, 2:05 pm
Following Masih v Yousah (2014) EWCA Civ 234 (our report), it was not enough for the notice to state rent due at the time of service to rescue the omission. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 5:44 am
The two key cases are Province of Bombay v Municipal Corporation of the City of Bombay [1947] AC 58 and Lord Advocate v Dumbarton District Council [1990] 2 AC 580. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 9:30 pm
While there has been some studies of the case of R v Wewar, there has not been an investigation into the extent of the legal debates arising after this case. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 5:07 am
" However, in the one case where the matter has been argued, the result was inconclusive (Francis Day & Hunter Ltd v Bron [1963] Ch. 587.) [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 7:15 am
There are 94 for men, distributed around England and Wales, including several in London. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 1:48 am
ZS v DP on issue of mens rea in unlawful carnal knowledge. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 1:59 am
This is outwith the competence of the Scottish Parliament. 1453: The Advocate General states that the Scottish Parliament cannot proceed on basis that it will amend its legislation in future if it needs to. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 4:09 pm
Surveillance Privacy International has released a report: “Teach ‘em to Phish: State Sponsors of Surveillance” reviewing the approaches of governments to providing surveillance equipment to other countries. [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 4:19 pm
A firm in South Wales has been fined £60,000 by the ICO for allowing its telephone lines to be used to send spam texts. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 4:08 pm
The Transparency Project Blog has a post analysing the recent “civil partnership case”, R v Secretary of State for International Development [2018] UKSC 32. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 9:27 am
Freeman ‘The Impact of the CEDAW Convention: Paths to Equality A Study for the World Bank’ University of New South Wales Faculty of Law Research Series 2012, paper 7. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 11:02 am
In Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 4:49 am
In these decisions, the Patent Office is continuing to apply its adaptation of the England and Wales Court of Appeals’ four-step test for patentable subject matter, as set out in Aerotel Ltd v Telco Holdings Ltd; Macrossan’s Application, [2006] EWCA Civ 1371 (Aerotel/Macrossan), despite a lack of any clear authority for this approach in Australia.Meanwhile, one of two Federal Court appeals of Patent Office decisions has been terminated following unsuccessful… [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 4:16 pm
United States Summer Zervos’ defamation claim [read post]
16 Jun 2018, 12:25 pm
In Nori Holdings v Bank Otkritie [2018] EWHC 1343 (Comm), Males J critically discussed (and openly disagreed with) AG Wathelet’s Opinion on Case C-536/13 Gazprom and confirmed that such injunctions continue to not be available where they would restrain proceedings in another EU Member State. [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 10:17 pm
Section 44 of the Companies Act 2006 states:- “Execution of documents:- (1) Under the law of England and Wales or Northern Ireland a document is executed by a company— (a) by the affixing of its common seal, or (b) by signature in accordance with the following provisions. (2) A document is validly executed by a company if it is signed on behalf of the company— (a) by two authorised signatories, or (b) by a director of the company in the presence of a witness who… [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 10:17 pm
Section 44 of the Companies Act 2006 states:- “Execution of documents:- (1) Under the law of England and Wales or Northern Ireland a document is executed by a company— (a) by the affixing of its common seal, or (b) by signature in accordance with the following provisions. (2) A document is validly executed by a company if it is signed on behalf of the company— (a) by two authorised signatories, or (b) by a director of the company in the presence of a witness who… [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 4:26 pm
United States Stanford&rsq [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 4:23 pm
In O’Rourke v Camden LBC (1998) AC 188, the H [read post]
