Search for: "State v. Wines"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,020
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2014, 5:38 am
[No]SPIDERGRAPH Merely Descriptive of Printed Graphs and Charts, Says TTABDivided TTAB Panel Reverses Mere Descriptiveness Refusal of "GLOBAL MINING HOLDING COMPANY, LLC"Precedential No. 20: TTAB Affirms Mere Descriptiveness Refusal of TOURBILLON & Design for Jewelry and WatchesTest Your TTAB Judge-Ability: Is "N2WINES" Merely Descriptive of Wine Sold in Kegs? [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 6:53 am
Southern Wine and Spirits of Illinois v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 5:38 am
(See the policy reasoning in Renna v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 8:45 am
We turned it over on our desk the way you flip a sofa cushion with a red wine stain. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 9:00 am
Last summer we reported on Bell v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 4:58 am
at 15 (quoting McCarthy v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 7:00 am
Toth v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 5:34 am
citing DuoProSS Meditech Corp. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 2:59 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Kiobel v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 6:30 am
” (Wine Railway.) [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 7:48 am
Ohloff v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 4:32 am
But in Sherbert v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 1:24 pm
See Cassel v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 7:30 am
(See: Bevis v Renaissance Wine Merchants Ltd. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 12:30 am
” Saucier v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 7:05 am
See, e.g., Metzl v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 4:17 am
John Reinan, Got Wine at the Airport? [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 4:04 pm
’The General Court also found that * ‘the Community protection of wine names established by [that regulation] was based on wine names such as they were determined by laws of the Member States in compliance with the relevant provisions of that regulation. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 8:13 am
On Afro-IP, Caroline Ncube relates the tale of a South African wine brand dispute (Alto v Altus) which ended with Altus preferring a name change (to Fenix) to the prospect of defending a trade mark infringement claim. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 1:58 am
The relevant public by reference to which the absolute ground for refusal must be assessed is the average consumer in the Member State in which the place designated by a GI is situated. [read post]
