Search for: "Stephen Via v. State" Results 541 - 560 of 657
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2010, 8:18 am by James Bickford
Greg Bluestein of the Associated Press (via the Boston Globe) reports on Weis v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 9:44 am by uwlegalscholarship
Please direct submissions and any questions about our General Issue to Piper Reiff, Editor in Chief, via email at epreiff [at] charlestonlaw.edu or via telephone at (214) 707-1664. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 1:35 am
This blog, intriguingly, is dedicated to what Rob calls the new paradigm: "(1) the cyberspace "frontier" has closed; (2) state borders apply to the Internet; (3) the Internet is de-globalizing. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 8:42 pm by cdw
’” [via Defense Newsletter's Tim Cone] State v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 5:21 pm by Joe Mullin
Schreiner said the Court had “launched the United States Patent System into the Information Age with the Bilski v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:22 am by Frank Pasquale
Finally, China is capable of funding these projects via sovereign wealth funds (SWFs) that invest with political goals in mind. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:19 am by Adam Chandler
Finally, Wendy Kaminer has a piece for the Atlantic on the federal sex offender case, United States v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 6:35 am by James Bickford
Stephen Carter argues in a New York Times op-ed that “Ms. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:14 pm by cdw
Stephen Moreland Redd,  2010 Cal. [read post]
9 May 2010, 1:31 pm by Lawrence Solum
  And a final example is provided by Article V of the United States Constitution. [read post]
3 May 2010, 6:35 am by James Bickford
Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]