Search for: "Stephens v. State Bar"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,501
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2013, 4:19 pm
In the case at bar, the testimony of the prosecution's expert began innocuously, as it was intended to help the jury understand the complainant's intellectual limitations in the aftermath of the crime similar to People v Carroll and People v Story. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 4:44 pm
Stephens: If the district court holds that the habeas petitioner does indeed have a claim for ineffective assistance, does he need a certificate of appealability when the state appeals that holding, and the petitioner merely wants to argue on appeal other aspects of counsel's performance that the district court didn't find ineffective. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:13 am
John Francis Stephens. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 9:23 am
The holding in Gideon v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm
”[2] G v H (1994) A good starting point in discussing the issue of who is a parent is G v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm
”[2] G v H (1994) A good starting point in discussing the issue of who is a parent is G v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 7:15 am
In Part III, I defend Justice Antonin Scalia’s conclusion that “the Takings Clause bars the State from taking private property without paying for it, no matter which branch [of government] is the instrument of the taking. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 1:40 pm
The Department of Justice filed the second case, United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2007, 9:29 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 10:17 am
In Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 7:37 am
The dissenting justices, led by Justice Stephen G. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 7:40 am
In Powell v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 7:11 am
Alito, Jr., Stephen G. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 6:17 pm
McLennan of HindmanSanchez in the firm's blog, HOA Legi-Slate Eaton v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:21 am
Justice Breyer with opinion in Harris v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 7:40 pm
It was in that context that Carswell, J., stated: Therefore, section 211 of the Surrogate's Court Act is not applicable to or binding upon the United States. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 6:48 pm
It was in that context that Carswell, J., stated: Therefore, section 211 of the Surrogate's Court Act is not applicable to or binding upon the United States. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 12:07 pm
Justices Stephen G. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 7:28 pm
Where testator dies seized of real property in several states the courts of each state may construe the will as to the realty situated in its own state (Matter of Good's Will, 304 N.Y. 110, 116, 106 N.E.2d 36, 39, supra; In re Ellis' Estate, Sur., 139 N.Y.S.2d 640; De Vaughn v. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
The Kastl panel then extended that state law doctrine to Title VII. [read post]
