Search for: "Stone v. United States" Results 541 - 560 of 1,127
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2013, 8:08 am
  See, e.g., Larry Catá Backer, Emasculated Men, Effeminate Law in the United States, Zimbabwe and Malaysia. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 12:22 pm
This past summer, a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals overturned the ruling. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 9:25 am by John Floyd
  These terms were important to Cosino’s status in the United States. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 12:27 pm
 I was perfectly content with my life until Jeremy suggested that I blog about the United States Patent and Trademark Office (TTAB) Harry Winston v. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 5:54 am
 However, animal rights organisation People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) has taken legal action in the United States on the monkey’s behalf (naming it Naruto), claiming that the animal owns the copyright in the successful photographs and should therefore reap the benefits financially. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 10:30 am
The Court referred to the cases in Delaware that adopted United States Supreme Court’s definition of materiality, including recent Delaware disclosure opinions in the cases of In re Netsmart Techs., Inc. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Preemption, of course, would be The Beatles, and Daubert/Frye the Rolling Stones. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 8:13 am by Carolyn Shapiro
Carolyn Shapiro is associate professor of law and co-director of the Institute on the Supreme Court of the United States at Chicago-Kent College of Law. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
We've already deplored the recent decision of the West Virginia Supreme Court rejecting the learned intermediary rule outright, State ex rel. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 1:13 pm by kwalters
The position is created pursuant to the state constitution, currently at Article V, Section 1 of the 1970 Illinois Constitution. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 3:06 am by Scott Bomboy
Justice Robert Jackson, who had replaced Stone on the bench, systematically disassembled Frankfurter’s reasoning in his majority decision in West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]