Search for: "Strange v. Powers"
Results 541 - 560
of 964
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2014, 8:43 am
McDermott and Jenkins v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 8:23 pm
” Samson v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 10:30 am
However, more recent rulings, including Alden v. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 11:57 am
Bland v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 8:08 am
It’s a bit strange to try to make the law adjust for existing markets when law is so much more slow. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 1:02 am
[See Fitzpatrick v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 8:15 am
Wilkinson, which relied upon Estate of Thornton v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:49 pm
Isn’t all the bargaining power on the –on the side of the State? [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 7:41 am
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009), and PLIVA v. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 6:27 am
And in United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 3:40 am
Franciscan Vineyards, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 6:44 am
However, in the recent case of Yang v. [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 6:44 am
However, in the recent case of Yang v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 11:07 pm
(Will Baude) On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Atlantic Marine v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 9:55 am
It would have been very strange if the Court had declined review. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 5:00 am
Class actions are strange and dangerous things. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
But the line of reasoning that focuses on the old, common law definition of larceny neglects to take account of the fact that the modern definition of property for purposes of theft statutes has been broadened to include both tangible and intangible property.5 For example, the paradigmatic Model Penal Code, published first in 1962 by the sages at the American Law Institute, defines property for purposes of theft very broadly: “‘property’ means anything of value, including real… [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 11:25 pm
Screws v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 8:05 am
In Anderson v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 4:45 am
Sega; and No Doubt v. [read post]
