Search for: "Strange v. Strange"
Results 541 - 560
of 3,718
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2016, 5:24 am
The underlying case, Husain v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 11:24 am
Honest question, how much do you think that Justice Kennedy would pay to have California pass a constitutional amendment in 2010 before Perry v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 8:46 am
The style of the case is Royal Maccabees Life Insurance Company v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 8:29 am
Seed Co. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 8:00 am
In National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 2:17 pm
I know of at least 3 cases, the most recent from today in United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 4:09 am
These words, now a lodestar of constitutional law, almost didn’t make it into [New York Times v.] [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 5:59 am
CTI Services, L.L.C. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 9:04 am
., doing something wrong.But it still seems strange that you gotta pay costs for an appeal that you didn't initiate and didn't even fight -- and that you gotta pay 'em even even in the even you prevail on the merits on remand. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 7:50 pm
US v. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 2:31 pm
The reader is basically left entirely in the dark about what we're talking about.The opinion also, strangely, feels the need to drop a footnote that defines what a credit card is. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 1:09 pm
The chances of that happening are too strange for me to calculate; the probability of drawing all three of the Bush appointees is around three and a half percent, and the chance of doing that plus drawing none of the Trump appointees is pretty much absurdly smaller. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 11:43 am
Mabry v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 8:14 pm
Which might seem a very strange, technology specific approach to take in this day and age. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 1:47 pm
Zareas v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:23 pm
Burnet v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 9:49 am
Maryland Port Authority and Darby v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 2:05 pm
., Jr. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 3:00 am
I can't believe that I missed this hilarious piece of Harry Potter legal news when it first came out in 2003, but if you're like me and were too caught up in the HP madness to discover this gem, then here is another look at the Vladimir Putin v. [read post]
