Search for: "Sweet v. Sweet" Results 541 - 560 of 1,646
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2011, 9:57 am
The auditors did warn WIPO that its building budget was going to be at the expense of its ageing rapid response Central Europe dot.biz tank squad Some dedicated readers -- almost all, judging by the IPKat's mailbox -- have been following the saga of WIPO v WIPD (see earlier posts here, here and here) and who have been wondering what, if anything, the World Intellectual Property Organization has been doing to snuff out the imitation website of the World Intellectual Property… [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 8:40 am
(iii) Duplication of the trial judge's role on appeal is a disproportionate use of the limited resources of an appellate court, and will seldom lead to a different outcome in an individual case [but it does happen: Lumos Skincare v Sweet Squared, noted here by the IPKat, happened less than a year ago. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 1:00 am
Now, if you read this section of the transcript, it appears that Zach Scruggs did not know exactly what was meant by the Jones v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 3:11 am
A “general release” of liability for an injury is not sufficient to insulate a governmental agency from liability resulting from its own negligenceRigney v Ichabod Crane Cent. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 4:30 am
A "general release" of liability for an injury is not sufficient to insulate a governmental agency from liability resulting from its own negligenceRigney v Ichabod Crane Cent. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 5:00 am
The district court’s express preemption ruling in Simoneau v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 6:56 am by INFORRM
  Some cases will result in several interim hearings – there were, for example, three hearings in Rufus v Elliott in the year in question. [read post]