Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 541 - 560
of 4,720
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2021, 9:14 am
That ruling opened up some new jurisprudential frontiers, but those frontiers may have closed back down. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 12:31 pm
Protecting the consumer from what? [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 7:09 pm
While rates can be quite high (for example, the 21% APR in Till v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 6:37 am
Nicole Flatow of ACSblog reports on the effects of the Court’s 2011 decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
1 Jun 2013, 2:03 pm
It's no less famous than the AT&T one, but less supportive of the EFF's argument. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 7:30 am
It also defines “energy use” as “the quantity of energy directly consumed by a consumer product at point of use,” and “energy” as “electricity, or fossil fuels. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 8:00 am
The court says that the plaintiff properly pled trademark infringement, Lanham Act false advertising and a violation of the Michigan Consumer Protection Act, and therefore it denied a motion to dismiss. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 2:49 pm
By way of contrast, today’s antitrust analysis of alleged exclusionary conduct begins with (ironically enough) the U.S. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 2:14 pm
Previous post: "Email Ad Network Isn't Liable for Unsolicited Email--Ferron v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 9:02 am
Delsman Satirical Anti-Birther Blog Post Protected by DC's Anti-SLAPP Law--Farah v. [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 9:12 am
ends up helping Florida. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 6:57 am
Boost Beauty, LLC v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 8:31 am
See Cardtoons, L.C. v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 7:27 am
Compulife Software Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 11:12 am
As it turns out, the consumers' perceived source of the allegedly defamatory content didn't come up in the court's discussion. [read post]
18 May 2010, 12:31 pm
Judge Robreno looked at the consumer protection laws of each relevant state and held that Delaware’s consumer protection law conflicted with the consumer protection laws of the other three states: Pennsylvania law requires reliance and Delaware law does not; New York law requires a plaintiff to show the defendant’s deceptive act caused plaintiff’s injuries and Delaware law does not; and Michigan law is limited to transactions… [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 12:16 pm
On appeal, the Ninth Circuit considered whether the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA) provides for a cause of action for contributory cybersquatting. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 9:13 am
The court declines supplemental jurisdiction over the standard trifecta of California consumer protection claims, but refiling those in state court might be a fast track to an anti-SLAPP motion. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 12:01 pm
By Eric Goldman Ezzo v. [read post]
2 May 2022, 7:42 am
If LinkedIn can’t do anything to protect its users’ interests in publicly shared data, can anyone else do it? [read post]
