Search for: "T. K." Results 541 - 560 of 20,652
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
This is another examination appeal. [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In particular the examples of the patent fall within the scope of the claim as granted whereas in the case underlying T 108/91 all the examples were outside the scope of the claim. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 4:17 am by Broc Romanek
Thus, I wasn't surprised to see Donnelley's announcement that it had bought Bowne yesterday. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
J 24/97 [2.2] and T 1026/06 [4], and the references cited therein.[6] The Board is of the opinion that this date is September 20, 2011, i.e. the day on which the professional representative signed the acknowledgement of receipt. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Both the opponent and the company affiliated to it were interested in presenting the object disputed in T 292/93 to potential customers. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 4:27 am by admin
A retired New York State Police K-9 dog, attacked the plaintiff’s dog. [read post]
11 Dec 2022, 1:04 pm by Russell Knight
” In re Marriage of Hamilton, 128 NE 3d 1237 – Ill: Appellate Court, 5th Dist. 2019 “[T]he date of dissolution is the proper date for valuation of the parties’ [marital assets]. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
Upon consulting documents J and K, it becomes clear that the former relates to the rhuMoAb HER2 phase II clinical trial wher [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Therefore, the knowledge of the method and the conditions for determining the parameter is required for the parameter to be unambiguously defined (see T 412/02 [5.8-9]). [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 3:04 pm by Armand Grinstajn
The issue before the Board in case T 500/01 was whether the expression "Kabat together with Chotia" had a basis in the parent application as filed. [read post]
9 May 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
T 1561/05 [2.1.3] and the cases cited there). [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 7:46 am by Staci Zaretsky
Suspending the 401(k) matching program won't even be enough to cover the firm's losses. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 11:01 am by Oliver G. Randl
The cited decisions T 759/91 [2.2] and T 522/91 [2.2] both refer to the decision T 472/88 [3], wherein it was decided that the term “consisting essentially of” was clear and allowed the presence of other components in a claimed composition in addition to the components mandatory in the claim, provided that the essential characteristics of the claimed composition are not materially affected by their presence.The Board agrees with these previous decisions. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In T 1981/12 the Board considered in detail the background of the rule. [read post]
22 May 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Reference was also made to decisions T 793/93 and T 204/00 as cited in the Case Law, 6th edition, 2010, page 560.The board, however, cannot agree with the above arguments. [read post]