Search for: "Tam v. State"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,446
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2024, 10:03 am
While the defense argued that the defendants were not guilty of subversion as subverting state power involves the use or threat of force, the court referenced HKSAR v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 9:53 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 12:08 pm
Miller v. [read post]
13 Nov 2022, 7:27 am
Polansky v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 11:49 am
The Antoons argue that because the qui tam action was filed within one year of the dismissal of their state case, the state claim was preserved by Ohio’s saving statute, R.C. 2305.19(A). [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 8:13 am
Drummond v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm
In allowing abortion providers to sue only a narrow set of state officials, the Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 12:38 pm
While the qui tam action was pending, CTI sued Lash in state court on several grounds. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 9:54 am
This case is titled, United States ex rel Jones, et al., v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 6:00 am
After all, Pfizer wrote in their description of "priviliged documents" below, "Unsealing of qui tam action and implications for Rost. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 11:08 am
Eisenstein v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 2:25 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 11:00 am
On March 15, 2011 in an Opinion and Order on defendants' motion to dismiss in Hy Cite Corporation v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 3:55 pm
In Bashin v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 2:20 pm
American Catalog Mailers Association v. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 10:34 am
Herbold v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 11:58 am
In addition to the qui tam provisions, one of the most vital aspects of the FCA is its anti-retaliation provisions. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 10:09 am
Chan v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 2:19 pm
Soil Water Con. v. [read post]
