Search for: "Taylor v. Taylor"
Results 541 - 560
of 4,346
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2021, 2:27 pm
There are already numerous opinions from the California Court of Appeal -- and a resulting split -- as to whether Proposition 64 applies to the possession of marijuana in prison. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 5:39 am
In Taylor v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 8:32 pm
The petition of the day is: Taylor v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 11:59 am
Court of Federal Claims, Taylor Energy v. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 6:13 pm
In State v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 9:02 am
The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] 7-1 Monday in Taylor v. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 10:31 am
By: Loyd Willaford and Sarah Burke In Taylor v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 9:00 am
* Taylor Lodise is a law clerk in the Litigation practice group. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 12:00 pm
HABEAS Taylor v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 5:36 am
Read through the chapter on Sands, Taylor & Wood Co. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 8:28 pm
See Taylor v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 9:11 am
Today's advance release land use law opinion: Taylor v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 4:10 am
No right to discovery in a disciplinary procedure unless provided by law or specifically provided by the collective bargaining agreementMatter of Pfau v Public Employment Relations Board, 2010 NY Slip Op 00340, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentThe Public Employment Relations Board (PERB) determined that the Unified Court System (UCS) engaged in an improper practice under the Taylor Law (Civil [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 9:11 am
” Kim Taylor-Thompson, States of Mind/States of Development, 14 STAN. [read post]
23 Aug 2024, 11:58 am
Attorneys Nick Laurent, Blaire Knox, and Andrew York were recently featured in an in-depth interview with Super Lawyers senior editor Beth Taylor, where they discussed their pivotal win in the case of Texas Department of Transportation v. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 3:17 am
By all appearances, the Court is seriously considering whether to grant cert. in Taylor v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 12:24 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 12:23 am
Practice point: Summary judgment is not warranted where credible evidence reveals differing versions of the accident.Student note: While hearsay statements may be used to oppose the motion, such evidence is insufficient to warrant the motion's denial where it is the only evidence submitted in opposition.Case: Taylor v. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 4:10 am
In Taylor v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:22 am
Zipper clause in a collective bargaining agreementVillage of Tarrytown v Tarrytown Police Asso., 31 PERB 4540A zipper clause in a Taylor Law collective bargaining contract sets out the fact that the parties “agree that to the extent agreement is possible on negotiable items it has been reached in [the] agreement. [read post]
