Search for: "Taylor v. Taylor" Results 541 - 560 of 4,298
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2014, 12:48 pm
There were three witnesses to a crime that Scott Jones allegedly committed. [read post]
24 Sep 2022, 3:17 pm
The principle is illustrated by a British Columbia Supreme Court decision earlier this year.In Chung v. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Other court decisions addressing areas excluded from mandatory negotiations within the meaning of the Taylor Law include City of Plattsburgh v Local 788, 108 AD2d 1045 and Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Other court decisions addressing areas excluded from mandatory negotiations within the meaning of the Taylor Law include City of Plattsburgh v Local 788, 108 AD2d 1045 and Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 4:10 am
No right to discovery in a disciplinary procedure unless provided by law or specifically provided by the collective bargaining agreementMatter of Pfau v Public Employment Relations Board, 2010 NY Slip Op 00340, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentThe Public Employment Relations Board (PERB) determined that the Unified Court System (UCS) engaged in an improper practice under the Taylor Law (Civil [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 12:23 am by John Diekman
Practice point: Summary judgment is not warranted where credible evidence reveals differing versions of the accident.Student note: While hearsay statements may be used to oppose the motion, such evidence is insufficient to warrant the motion's denial where it is the only evidence submitted in opposition.Case: Taylor v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:22 am
Zipper clause in a collective bargaining agreementVillage of Tarrytown v Tarrytown Police Asso., 31 PERB 4540A zipper clause in a Taylor Law collective bargaining contract sets out the fact that the parties “agree that to the extent agreement is possible on negotiable items it has been reached in [the] agreement. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 9:11 am
Today's advance release land use law opinion: Taylor v. [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 9:11 am by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
” Kim Taylor-Thompson, States of Mind/States of Development, 14 STAN. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 3:17 am
By all appearances, the Court is seriously considering whether to grant cert. in Taylor v. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 2:43 pm
Nominiert für IP-Recht sind:   Hoffmann Eitle Jonas Krieger Mes & Graf v. der Groeben Lovells Taylor Wessing   Wir fiebern im Geiste mit und wünschen allen Beteiligten viel Glück! [read post]