Search for: "The Active v. United States" Results 541 - 560 of 18,193
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2007, 7:30 am
27 June 2007 the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Court decided on The Saunders Group, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 1:39 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 3:35 am
Elections are strange constitutional hybrids; they involve activities at the core of the First Amendment's protections and yet are pervasively regulated by the state. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 11:11 am
This post draws upon an article forthcoming in the Virginia Law Review The Second Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 5:50 am by James Yang
Bottom line: A covered business method (CBM) proceeding is a post patent grant proceeding at the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 1:28 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
” This Directive, which is the foundational legal document for all cybersecurity policies in the United States, evidences government efforts to enlist private sector companies, more broadly monitor Internet activity, and develop offensive cybersecurity capability. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 12:31 pm by Aimee Hess
” Roland argued that repairs and testing activities during the period of non-production met the definition of Unit Operations under the Lease. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 8:54 am
United States largely avoids the big constitutional issue that was the original focus of the case: the scope of the treaty power. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 4:25 am
Actively participating in the arbitration process without objection precludes the party later claiming that the matter presented to the arbitrator was not subject to arbitration Matter of Jandrew v County of Cortland, 2011 NY Slip Op 04143, Appellate Division, Third Department Cortland County terminated Bryon Jandrew from his position with the County.Jandrew filed a grievance under the relevant collective bargaining agreement [CBA]. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 2:03 pm by Jeff Schmitt
United States explains, “The nondiscrimination rule finds its reason in the principle that the States may not directly obstruct the activities of the Federal Government. [read post]
” If a landowner knowingly conducts prohibited activity on wetlands meeting the arguably ambiguous definition of a “waters of the United States,” he could face penalties in excess of $75,000 per day. [read post]