Search for: "The Java"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,500
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2015, 8:44 pm
At the same time that Android has become truly ubiquitous, the Java platform has suffered more than ever. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:05 pm
This outbreak is caused by Salmonella Paratyphi B variant L(+) tartrate(+) bacteria, formerly known as Salmonella Java. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:01 pm
This outbreak is caused by Salmonella Paratyphi B variant L(+) tartrate(+) bacteria, formerly known as Salmonella Java. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 4:22 pm
Other information from CDC’s report: This outbreak is caused by Salmonella Paratyphi B variant L(+) tartrate(+) bacteria, formerly known as Salmonella Java. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 10:59 am
This outbreak is caused by Salmonella Paratyphi B variant L(+) tartrate(+) bacteria, formerly known as Salmonella Java. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 10:00 am
Google did not have a formal license from the maker of Java, Sun Microsystems, to use the Java technologies. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
In all four cases, company employees were exposed to a zero-day Java exploit as they viewed a website for iOS developers. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 8:32 pm
Google, however, will presumably argue that interoperability must be the fair use topic on remand, despite the fact, which the Department of Justice also noted, that Google "purposely designed Android not to be compatible with the Java platform or interoperable with Java programs. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 11:43 pm
— Caroline B Ncube (@caro_ncube) June 29, 2015#sandtondiscussion led by @LQamata focusing on ugandan trade mark law: mandela auto spares oppose the registration of nairobi java house. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 7:00 pm
Under the rules of Java, they must be identical to declare a method specifying the same functionality — even when the implementation is different. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 7:55 am
For additional information regarding Java and Chrome please visit: How do I use Java with the Google Chrome browser? [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:54 pm
Way, way back in December of last year the Kats hosted a guest blogpost from Thomas Dubuisson, "Oracle v Google: are certain elements of the Java platform entitled to copyright protection? [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 8:46 am
On Monday, the Supreme Court denied certiorari in Google’s appeal of the Federal Circuit’s 2014 ruling that that the declaring code and the structure, sequence, and organization of 37 Java API packages are entitled to copyright protection. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 3:30 am
Both EFS-Web, the USPTO’s online patent application and document submission tool, and Private PAIR, a secure portal for learning the status of a patent application, utilize Java programming script for authenticating users when they sign in to those services. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 10:42 am
Oracle claims a copyright on the Java Application Programming Interface (API), and that Google infringed that copyright by using certain Java APIs in the Android OS. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:38 am
Here is how we described the issue in our earlier coverage: The dispute centers on Google copying names, declarations, and header lines of the Java APIs in Android. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:12 am
Oracle (Federal Circuit held that the Java API naming scheme was copyrightable and not an ineligible “system or method of operation”). [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:33 am
Department of Justice wrote in its submission to the Supreme Court:"The Android platform uses the Java programming language, but [Google] purposely designed Android not to be compatible with the Java platform or interoperable with Java programs. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 11:38 pm
Apologies for the late notice of this week's #SandtonDiscussion which focuses on the recent decision in the trade mark opposition by Mandela Auto Spares against the attempt to register trade marks in class 43 (restaurant services) containing the word JAVA by Nairobi Java House Limited on the basis of rights in the word JAVAS and CAFE JAVAS. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 3:05 pm
Takeaway: The Examiner rejected as indefinite the phrase "parsing the at least one Java annotation" on the grounds that Java was a trademark. [read post]
