Search for: "The People v. Officer" Results 541 - 560 of 22,859
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2024, 12:50 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
  This is also the underlying constitutional question in the Supreme Court's Moore v. [read post]
But Pak didn’t fit the pattern of landlord-tenant disputes and people shooting their mouths off that the officer had dealt with previously. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 9:21 am by Eric S. Solotoff
These issues came up in the unreported (non-precedential) case of K.K. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 10:40 am by Jeffrey Randa
That the petitioner has the ability and motivation to drive safely and within the law. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 7:54 am by Stephen Bilkis
The officers followed the vehicle to different locations, including a college campus and eventually a residential street. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:35 pm
v=BxL9DRdk6Xc   New Animation: End Hare Coursing In a world where compassion and empathy should be our guiding principles, it is disheartening to discover that some individuals derive enjoyment and profit from the suffering of innocent creatures. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 2:15 pm by Michael Lowe
Weaved throughout all this brouhaha, however, not only for those dedicated to representing people accused of illegal activity here in Texas and elsewhere, but for most law enforcement and prosecutorial offices, are the inevitable Super Bowl arrests that will be made based upon sex crimes and allegations of human trafficking. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:09 am by Kurt Lash
Akhil Reed Amar (Yale) and Vikram David Amar (Illinois) in Trump v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
The Commitment Rule is a further development of the proposal we submitted to the Secretariat of UNCITRAL Working Group V (Insolvency) in an open letter on September 14, 2023. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]