Search for: "Thomson Licensing"
Results 541 - 550
of 550
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2007, 1:20 am
Alcatel-Lucent successfully argued that the '080 and '457 patents were not covered by the license. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 9:46 pm
failed to mention that Thomson did cite (and distinguish) the work of Bongso in his '780 patent,2. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 1:55 pm
Microsoft's licensing bill for Thomson/Fraunhofer was only $16 million -- about 1 percent of what it now owes Alcatel-Lucent. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 8:14 am
Instead, two other patent holders, Fraunhofer Institute and Thomson, promoted the technology to standards bodies, then sold licenses starting in the mid-1990s. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 6:40 am
Two of the major providers are Thomson Gale and EBSCO. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 6:22 pm
Patent and Trademark Office, citing exorbitant licensing fees [IPBiz: irrelevant in a re-exam] and arguing that Thomson's work was not unique enough to qualify for a patent [IPBiz: the stronger challenge is obviousness, not novelty, tho probably neither will work at the USPTO]. [read post]
6 Jan 2007, 5:42 pm
Eerily broadcast-flag reminiscent: there's a group backed by a bunch of interested incumbent companies (Motorola, Thomson, Samsung, Philips, Nextwave, France Telecom, and others) that is developing a standard (see last slide) for protection of incumbent licensed devices from harmful interference. [read post]
9 Nov 2006, 7:53 am
But no agreement is necessary to spell out the terms of the copyright license given by the copyright holder, BLG LLP in this case. [read post]
4 Oct 2006, 8:07 am
WARF has made free licenses and cells available to more than 300 academic research groups but charges companies as much as $400,000. [read post]
20 Jul 2006, 4:39 pm
In fact, WARF provides free licenses and cells to over 300 non-profit research groups. [read post]
