Search for: "Tips v. United States"
Results 541 - 560
of 2,633
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2013, 8:08 am
Briefly: At PrawfsBlawg, Will Baude covers United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 12:16 pm
The detention and search of a vessel on international waters and the Fourth Amendment implications of that stop and search were addressed by the Third Circuit in United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 9:05 am
With immigration reform stalled once again by United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 1:32 pm
”[16] The Decision in Martoma In United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 10:57 am
United States, a Sarbanes-Oxley anti-shredding case. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 10:06 am
The OWB received whistleblower tips and complaints from all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 1:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 2:06 pm
United States, 436 U.S. 128, 130-43 (1978); United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:00 pm
Employer and union sponsored group health plans covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and their insurers are not required to comply with a Vermont state law that requires health insurers and certain other parties to report payments relating to health care claims and other information relating to health care services to a state agency for compilation in an all-inclusive health care database, according to the United States Supreme… [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:10 am
(argued April 16, 2018): U.S. laws generally apply only to conduct that happens in the United States. [read post]
7 Jun 2008, 6:38 pm
Thus, it has been held that collecting information about the movement of a vehicle on public thoroughfares by means of an electronic device attached to a vehicle's undercarriage, which does not damage the vehicle or invade its interior, does not constitute a search or seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment (see United States v Knotts, 460 U.S. at 281-282; United States v McIver, 186 F3d 1119, 1126-1127 [9th Cir 1999], cert denied 528… [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 4:29 pm
To be sure, the purpose of the IFR is to seek to comply with a 2021 Supreme Court decision, United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 8:16 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 10:17 am
In Fast v. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 10:24 am
H.J.Res.69 Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the final rule of the Department of the Interior relating to “Non-Subsistence Take of Wildlife, and Public Participation and Closure Procedures, on National Wildlife Refuges in Alaska”. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 6:12 am
On Semiconductor v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 1:19 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 3:56 am
SCOTUS has come down with its first opinion of the term, holding in United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 6:25 am
In United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 8:00 am
It was the case of Grant v. [read post]
