Search for: "U. S. v. Holder"
Results 541 - 560
of 563
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2008, 12:07 pm
Court Rejects Discriminatory Failure to Hire Claim Based Solely on Applicant's Own AllegationsGaston v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 5:00 am
Hearn v. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 2:06 pm
AGL guarantees all of AGASC's obligations, including the obligation to make periodic payments under the Non Qualified Assignment.Please note that the Boards of Directors of AGASC and AGL have taken appropriate actions acknowledging that AGASC is the assignee under the Non Qualified Assignment and Release in the case entitled XXXXXXX v YYYYYY and owner of the Annuity Contract XXXXXXX. [read post]
20 Sep 2008, 12:46 am
Last week the U. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 10:01 pm
I use the recent United States Supreme Court case Kelo v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 1:56 pm
Williams, 553 U. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 6:19 pm
The authorized sale of an article that substantially embodies a patent exhausts the patent holder's rights and prevents the patent holder from invoking patent law to control postsale use of the article. (553 U. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 3:45 am
See Keeler v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 1:33 am
Cold War vet; exempt
Chapter
Signed Date
Effective Date6
01/28/2008
takes effect on (1/03/2008) the same date and in the same manner as chapter 655/2007, takes effect Last Act: 01/28/08 SIGNED CHAP.67
A8582A
Alessi (MS) -- Relates to the prevailing wage paid by individuals who are awarded public works contracts BLURB : Lab. prevailing wage
Chapter
Signed Date
Effective Date7
… [read post]
20 May 2008, 10:02 am
If mom and dad bail Billy out of jail for drunk driving, they may not have sufficient resources to pay his brother's room and board at Ivy League U. [read post]
4th DCA: If girlfriend shoots and kills boyfriend, does she get to keep the jointly titled accounts?
3 May 2008, 3:10 pm
Julia v. [read post]
1 May 2008, 11:21 am
See Hamilton v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
When a Member State's law grants a monopoly of exploitation to the owner of such a right, it follows that the owner may forbid any unauthorized third party, or infringer, from any sale, use or other exploitation within that State.[40] If an industrial or commercial property right has considerable economic significance, the owner in one State usually seeks to obtain parallel protection in all of the other States of the Community; however, this is not always possible, either because… [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 7:57 am
" Lamie v. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 4:30 am
Jefferson v. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 6:30 pm
Chakrabarty, 447 U. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
Schmidlin v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 9:29 pm
Nebraska, 164 U. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 7:16 am
U. [read post]
