Search for: "U. S. v. King"
Results 541 - 560
of 573
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2008, 2:17 pm
Term, 2nd Dept., decided 5/27/2008)Kings Civil's grant of summary judgment to plaintiff medical provider REVERSED. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 11:57 am
Co., 17 Misc.3d 950, 952 [Civ.Ct., Kings Co., 2007, Edwards, J.]; see, also, S & M Supply Inc. v. [read post]
6 May 2008, 10:10 am
In Hochhauser v. [read post]
27 Apr 2008, 3:21 pm
Any medical provider litigator who does not at least consider the potential advantage of commencing as many no-fault recovery actions as possible in the most favorable forum would be doing the client a professional disservice.In Tribeca Med., P.C. v Dollar Rent A Car, 2008 NY Slip Op 50812(U) (NYC Civil Court, Richmond County, decided 4/22/2008), defendant moved to change venue from Richmond County, where plaintiff's counsel's office was located, to… [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:29 am
Subscription Required
KINGS COUNTYCivil Practice
Limited Questioning on Doctor's Financial Interest In Insurance Carrier Proper, Not Prejudicial
Browne v. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 10:38 am
Disrupt the enemy's formations, interfere with their methods of operations, change the rules in which they are used to following, go contrary to their standard training. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 10:48 am
Louis Gossett Jr. is a U. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 11:50 pm
They don't have to be politicians or moral theorists or divinities like Dworkin's Hercules or philosopher kings. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 1:09 pm
Kentucky, 476 U. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 5:57 pm
Defendant: Styles 4 U, Hyuk Chung, Does Case Number: 2:2008cv01485 Genis Productions, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
When a Member State's law grants a monopoly of exploitation to the owner of such a right, it follows that the owner may forbid any unauthorized third party, or infringer, from any sale, use or other exploitation within that State.[40] If an industrial or commercial property right has considerable economic significance, the owner in one State usually seeks to obtain parallel protection in all of the other States of the Community; however, this is not always possible, either because… [read post]
9 Mar 2008, 10:20 pm
The Second Department's decision in Deborah Int’l Beauty Ltd. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 6:57 am
U. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 9:53 am
The University of Chicago Law Review, Issue 74:4 (Fall 2007) Articles David S. [read post]
24 Dec 2007, 7:01 am
Box 2671, Kings Hill St. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 12:25 am
Kelly
Subscription Required
KINGS COUNTYWorkers' Compensation
Employee Not Acting in Furtherance of 'Alter Ego' Employer's Purpose; WCL Not Bar to Recovery
Anduaga v. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 12:49 pm
Since it seems that the patient actually appeared for the EUO, it's a much tougher call to make than the more often litigated situation of an EUO no-show where non-compliance vitiates coverage.Delta Diagnostic Radiology, P.C. v MVAIC, 2007 NY Slip Op 52143(U) (Civ. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 12:09 am
Here is an interesting but tragic case currently in trial in King County, Washington. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 1:20 am
Fulton Interest LLC
Subscription Required
KINGS COUNTYJudges
Judge Recuses Himself From Case Due to Senator's Of Counsel Status at One Party's Firm
Frankel v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 12:43 pm
Simon's Island, and Thalman. [read post]
