Search for: "U.S. v. Patrick*"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,343
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2016, 4:39 am
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit and Judge Janice Rogers Brown of the U.S. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 5:44 pm
The National Security Archive fought the agency for years in court to release the historically significant volume, only to have the U.S. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 3:54 pm
And Article V enables the states, by “the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States,” to require Congress to call a Constitutional Convention. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 8:31 am
Matsumoto of the U.S. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 6:51 am
The money followed a legal but circuitous route turbocharged by the 2014 ruling in McCutcheon v. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 8:00 am
Hardwick in which the U.S. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 7:10 am
The Implications and Consequences of United Kingdom Exit from the EU by Patrick J Birkinshaw, Andrea Biondi (eds,)€ 125 The post USA: Lyda v. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 4:43 am
” Additional commentary on the case comes from Dan Weiner and Brent Ferguson at U.S. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 12:39 am
The court also affirmed the Board’s ruling that the challenged claims of the reviewed patent were invalid as anticipated (Wi-Fi One, LLC v. [read post]
17 Sep 2016, 4:01 am
., respectively, the U.S. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 12:18 pm
And wisely so: Such an argument would directly contravene the rule of Patrick, 486 U.S. at 102, Ticor, 504 U.S. at 633, and N.C. [read post]
[Sasha Volokh] Can a state immunize its agencies from federal antitrust law through judicial review?
13 Sep 2016, 7:16 am
Ct. at 1116 (quoting Ticor, 504 U.S. at 638). [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 1:21 pm
” Ticor, 504 U.S. at 636 (citing City of Lafayette v. [read post]
11 Sep 2016, 2:23 pm
Summary and analysis of recent U.S. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 9:02 pm
Verner and most recently in Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 1:00 pm
The approach of the PACE trial was soundly rejected by a committee of the U.S. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 2:45 am
The U.S. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 2:40 am
In addition, MacDermid’s Digital CST printing plates did not infringe another DuPont patent (E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2016, 11:26 am
U.S. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 6:18 pm
Related Cases: U.S. v. [read post]
