Search for: "US v. Diaz"
Results 541 - 560
of 874
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
As used in this paragraph, "laser sighting system or device" means any system or device that is integrated with or affixed to a firearm and emits a laser light beam that is used to assist in the sight alignment or aiming of the firearm. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 10:06 am
(Michael Diaz Jr. represents Guevara in this case.) [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 11:26 am
NIMJ in US v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 6:51 am
” At Slate, Dahlia Lithwick provides an excerpt of her report for Dan Rather Reports on the practical impact of last Term’s decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 12:30 pm
E.g., United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 2:36 am
The trial is State v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:56 pm
" In that November 2007 decision in a case known as state v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 5:30 pm
CAAF granted review today in United States v. [read post]
31 May 2010, 4:16 pm
Id. at *2-*3.How to Use: Orozco-Acosta follows a circuit trend of hedging-in the Supreme Court’s recent Confrontation Clause cases of Crawford and Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 7:09 pm
Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 12:58 pm
The introduction of the CHR violate defendant's confrontation rights under Crawford and under Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 12:16 pm
Section 102, "National Nanotechnology Program Amendments" would require, within 12 months of the bill's enactment into law, of a strategic plan to guide the National Science and Technology Council (NSTC) in achieving activities described in an earlier section and to guide the activities described under subsection (b) that specifies near-term and long-term objectives for the Program, the anticipated time frame for achieving the near-term objectives, and the metrics to be… [read post]
18 May 2010, 4:20 pm
S. 229, and n. 7 (1974); Diaz v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 7:41 pm
A friend o’ CAAFlog was kind enough to shoot us a copy today; here’s a link. [read post]
11 May 2010, 6:20 am
In HILB Rogal & Hobbs Co. v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 12:00 am
Juvenile Department v. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:41 am
Diaz, 801 F.2d 46, 53 (2d Cir. 1986) (applying New Jersey law). [read post]
7 May 2010, 2:00 pm
See Siegel v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 9:00 pm
Let us also remember that one of the justices, Scalia, whom I have wished off the bench since the 1980's still brought us the marvelous Melendez-Diaz opinion which followed his marvelous Crawford opinion. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 3:16 pm
In contrast, several other circuits use the “incidental damages standard” that was first enunciated by the Fifth Circuit in Allison v. [read post]
