Search for: "US v. Jordan" Results 541 - 560 of 1,386
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2012, 10:00 pm
Headstrong, Inc., ARB Nos. 11-008, 11-065, ALJ No. 2011-LCA-38 (ARB June 29, 2012) Final Decision and Order PDF | HTM Jordan v. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 10:00 pm
Headstrong, Inc., ARB Nos. 11-008, 11-065, ALJ No. 2011-LCA-38 (ARB June 29, 2012) Final Decision and Order PDF | HTM Jordan v. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 11:30 am by Unknown
"'Bridging Cultures through Food': A Qualitative Analysis of Food Dynamic Between Italian Host Families and Ukrainian Refugees," International Journal of Intercultural Relations, vol. 102 (Sept. 2024) - Authors (4) = Chile/Italy (lead), Italy (3) - APC = USD 3260 "'I wish I had listened and not come to South Africa': Fantasies, Expectations and Trajectories of Migration among Ethiopian Unaccompanied Child Migrants into South… [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 4:45 am by Lucy Reed
I gave up on carrying it around at all last year as it was superceded by a deluge of stuff immediately upon publication (no fault of Jordans). [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 1:32 am
 When this Kat doesn't know, he reaches out to Kat readers: what really happened at the dawn of modern commercial trademark use? [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:56 am by centerforartlaw
The shoes were filled with holy water sourced from the Jordan River and adorned with religious symbols, including a miniature crucifix and the inscription “MT. 14:25,” referencing the biblical passage describing Jesus walking on water.[20] Despite not being endorsed or made by Nike, the Jesus Shoes gained popularity and were worn by celebrities like Drake. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 7:51 am by Thomas Hopson
A friendly reminder:  We rely on our readers to send us links for the round-up. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
” We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
31 May 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
” We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 1:11 pm
  The movie reminds us to reserve judgment and not to allow initial impressions to obscure nuance. [read post]
16 May 2017, 12:30 pm by Dan Pinnington
This article is by Jordan Nichols, claims counsel at LAWPRO. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 3:31 am
Teva v Gilead, Abraxis v Comptroller and Wobben v Siemens kick of 2017's patent cases | AIPPI (UK) Event: 2016's patent cases - all you really need to know | BREAKING: CJEU rules that EU law does NOT prevent punitive damages in IP cases | Supreme Court rules Act of Parliament is needed to initiate UK leaving the EU| Book review: "From Maimonides to Microsoft: The Jewish Law of Copyright Since the Birth of Print"| Applications for information on… [read post]