Search for: "US v. London"
Results 541 - 560
of 3,698
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2013, 6:43 am
In Avon Estates (London) Limited v Sinclair Gardens Investments (Kensington) Limited [2013] UKUT 0264 (LC) [not online yet we have a transcript] the Upper Tribunal considered the question of whether an insurance premium had been reasonable incurred.Avon Estates was the leasehold owner of a flat within a Victorian terrace house that had been converted into three flats. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 1:09 am
The judgment In London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health [2023] UKSC 18, the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal unanimously, holding that Nuffield used the gym for its charitable purposes and was therefore entitled to the mandatory relief. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
* BREAKING: Jack the Ripper, Victorian Pubs & Curry: Welcome to London's UPC location & UPC Industry Coalition's conduct-based court feesAnnsley the AmeriKat shocks readers with news of the location of a court which, if the UK edges out of the European Union, may never be used for its chosen purpose ... [read post]
6 May 2010, 2:21 pm
TG, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Lambeth [2010] EWHC 907 (Admin) Or when is a child in need not a child in need? [read post]
6 May 2010, 2:21 pm
TG, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Lambeth [2010] EWHC 907 (Admin) Or when is a child in need not a child in need? [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 7:01 am
The case of ACCG v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 5:25 pm
” He also referred to the Flood v Times case, on its way to the Supreme Court. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 4:27 pm
Here, Greene asserted that viewers would view him as a criminal who used drugs and partied with prostitutes. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 12:15 am
Neary and his father London Borough of Hillingdon v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:53 am
The main focus of the seminar was on last month's decision of the General Court in Case T‑472/13, Lundbeck v European Commission. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 9:55 pm
This is a very interesting result indeed, although I use the word result in a non-definite kind of way. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 5:54 pm
City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005), and County of Hawaii v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 11:32 am
In MiPro Homes, LLC v. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 1:33 am
Meanwhile, on the PatLit blog, David Berry reports on yet another patent case that the US Supreme Court is happy to hear, Kimble v Marvel Enterprises, which will revisit the rule in Brulotte v Thys and the endearing practice of extracting royalty payments from a licensee after the patent has expired (this patent involves a Spiderman toy, if you were wondering). [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 6:40 am
The case, Global Reinsurance Corp. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 5:44 am
The recent United Kingdom court decision of Red Sky v. [read post]
13 Dec 2024, 5:34 am
For further information, click here.Botticelli v. [read post]
2 May 2009, 12:34 pm
The Supreme Court, see United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 7:40 am
City of New London. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 2:37 am
In a case which has more of the surreal about it, Kenneth Parker QC, sitting then as a Deputy Judge, had to decide whether to grant leave to a litigant in person to challenge Octavia Housing and Care’s allocations policy as it applied to that particular litigant in person (who did not challenge the lawfulness of Octavia’s lettings policy [and by extension, Locata, the West London sub-regional CBL scheme to which Octavia Hill subscribes]): R(Fidelis-Auma)… [read post]
