Search for: "US v. Mark Lewis"
Results 541 - 560
of 572
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2007, 4:05 am
LEWIS, C.J., and WELLS, PARIENTE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 4:47 am
Sachs Inc. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 10:53 am
" Jeannie Lewis-Levett v. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 10:26 am
For publication opinions today (2): In Mark Dorman and Tracy Dorman v. [read post]
3 Sep 2007, 7:28 am
Dist No. 403 v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:34 am
State v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 3:50 am
Smith v. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 12:58 pm
See Lewis, 543 N.E.2d at 1118. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 7:20 am
Lewis, 534 A.2d 720, 722 (N.H. 1987) (patient waives physician-patient privilege to relevant information by putting medical condition at issue); State v. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 1:11 am
V&E Raises Associate Salaries in Texas and D.C. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 11:30 pm
And Judge Kaplan concludes with the following passage from Berger v. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 12:39 am
" Similarly, the hearing officer in Lewis v. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 4:43 am
Classic Media, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 6:05 am
" They followed a often cited statement by Judge John Parker in the Fourth Circuit (see Mark Tushnet's post below). [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 1:00 am
Supreme Court, in Kelo v. [read post]
9 Jun 2007, 6:44 am
The Supreme Court has emphasized "the necessity for some undercover police activity," Lewis v. [read post]
20 May 2007, 10:37 pm
The TechnoLlama was first to let the IPKat know what the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit did last week in Perfect 10 v Amazon.com and Google Inc (full text of the judgment here).Left: not the TechnoLlama but the DeliLlamaThis decision is a must-read decision for anyone who is concerned with the development of copyright doctrine in the field of cached thumbnails. [read post]
14 May 2007, 10:49 pm
Mark Lewis's excellent contribution on outsourcing - a subject the IPKat reads only rarely and under duress - is however relatively timeless, since it is relatively rarely challenged by fundamental case law these days. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 11:19 am
Lewis (finding no due process violation by an officer in a high-speed chase resulting in an accident unless the officer set out explicitly to harm the fleeing suspect), it is now quite clear that police discretion about use of "deadly force" will be the controlling legal factor in future high-speed chase cases.Scott v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Justice Holmes and Sir Frederick Pollock 1874-1932 2 v. (1942) Holmes, Oliver Wendell; Pollock, Frederick; Howe, Mark De Wolfe (Editor). [read post]
