Search for: "US v. Nixon" Results 541 - 560 of 1,078
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2013, 8:29 pm by Marty Lederman
  (A recent student note offers a very useful, detailed account of the Court’s appointed amicus practice.) [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 4:43 am by Edith Roberts
” We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 2:18 pm by Russell Spivak, Jordan Brunner
If you are finding Lawfare useful in these times, please consider making a contribution to support what we do. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  Apart from his ACA decisions, in his dissent in Obergefell v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 9:30 am by Guest Blogger
Gerard Magliocca, buoyed by the ACA surviving a second Supreme Court review in King v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 3:07 am by Lyle Denniston
   They lost in the Supreme Court in a 5-to-4 decision in 1973 (Gilligan v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 5:00 am by Neil Siegel
It is unfortunate that the President still refuses to acknowledge the truth of that unanimous finding of the American intelligence and law enforcement communities, let alone use the bully pulpit of the presidency to condemn Russian interference and warn that there will be serious consequences if it happens again. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 10:50 am by Bexis
Our post the other day on Wolicki-Gables v. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 1:19 pm by ligitsec
Ford’s account of the Nixon pardon. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 8:00 am by Todd Presnell
  The presidential communications privilege, most prominently defined in Nixon v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 1:34 pm by Elie Mystal
I know one place that Keefe won’t be getting a job: Nixon Peabody. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 12:41 pm by Marie S. Newman
Professor Kinoy inspired us with "war stories" from his time in the legal trenches, including defending the Rosenbergs and arguing the landmark Dombrowski v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 8:00 am by Todd Presnell
  The presidential communications privilege, most prominently defined in Nixon v. [read post]