Search for: "US v. Potter"
Results 541 - 560
of 642
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
By Eric Goldman Copyrights * In the Harry Potter fair use case, the court declared that the Lexicon encyclopedia isn't fair use [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 5:06 pm
Low (< 1kGy) is used mostly to kill insects that infest foods 2. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 5:06 pm
Low (< 1kGy) is used mostly to kill insects that infest foods 2. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 9:18 am
He was assisted by V&E’s Bruce Blefeld, James Reeder Jr. and Harry Reasoner. [read post]
28 Sep 2008, 1:07 pm
Entertainment Inc. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 4:02 am
Potter, 377 F.3d 599 (6th Cir. 2004). [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 8:02 pm
In Pirant v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Australian Review of National Innovation System released: (IPRoo), (Mallesons Stephen Jaques), (creativecommons.org), (IP Menu News), Senate Committee on the Judiciary approval of Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights Act 2008 and surrounding debate (Law360), (Public Knowledge), (Ars Technica), (Wired), (Public Knowledge), (Ars Technica),… [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 7:30 am
Ent. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 1:25 pm
Chief Justice Steele: The AFSME v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 10:39 pm
Entertainment, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 5:04 pm
Entertainment v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 5:02 pm
Anthony Falzone writes about the court's decision to stop publication of The Harry Potter Lexicon, ruling against Fair Use. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 8:24 am
The Lexicon proved to be such a good resource that it was reputedly used by Warner Bros in their Harry Potter productions. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 4:33 pm
The court also found that the Lexicon created by a fan of the Harry Potter books was not sufficiently transformative to pass muster under the 4-part fair use test. [read post]
6 Sep 2008, 3:03 am
Chief Justice Steele: The AFSME v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt) Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 7:25 pm
To download a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: People v Potter [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:31 pm
Because it would be difficult for us to add anything of substance to the district court's comprehensive and well-reasoned opinion, we AFFIRM for the reasons stated by Judge David L. [read post]
