Search for: "USA v. Wolfe"
Results 541 - 560
of 621
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2015, 2:47 am
” Richard Wolf of USA Today reports on the road to the Court for the same-sex marriage issue and profiles Mary Bonauto, one of the lawyers who will argue on behalf of the plaintiffs tomorrow. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 6:25 am
” At USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that, in an attempt to look for precedents for the Act’s individual mandate, supporters of the law are looking to the Militia Act of 1792, which arguably required certain citizens to enter into commerce by purchasing military supplies. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 7:20 pm
” Richard Wolf of USA Today reports that “Supreme Court leans toward Trump plan to end DACA program for nearly 700K undocumented immigrants. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 4:29 am
” Briefly: At Justia’s Verdict blog, Sherry Colb discusses the court’s decision in Moore v. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 4:56 am
” With the Court having agreed earlier this month to review a challenge to two requirements imposed on abortion clinics in Texas, Richard Wolf of USA Today reports on two women seeking abortions in that state, suggesting that their stories “illustrate the human stakes involved in the most important abortion case to come before the high court in a quarter century. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 4:43 am
” Counting to 5 (podcast) features a discussion of Epic Systems v. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 6:49 am
Richard Wolf of USA Today reports that even as Kavanaugh has been a “reliable conservative vote” on the D.C. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 4:03 am
” For USA Today, Craig Gilbert and Richard Wolf report that “a new and wide-ranging national survey about the court by the Marquette University Law School … offers a sweeping snapshot of public perceptions of the court, its individual justices, its role, major rulings it has handed down and issues it could soon decide. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 4:30 am
” For USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that “the lead plaintiffs in four successive Supreme Court cases challenging the power of public employee unions,” including Mark Janus, all “take pride in helping conservative groups reach a tipping point in their decade-long, anti-union campaign. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 4:09 am
At USA Today, Richard Wolf notes that Knick, like two other cases on the court’s docket this term, calls on the Supreme Court to decide how to apply “the principle of stare decisis, or adhering to its earlier decisions. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 8:53 am
’” In USA Today, Richard Wolf looks ahead to this month’s challenge to Oklahoma’s lethal injection procedures and reports that “[t]he best that death penalty opponents likely can hope for is a narrow decision restricting the use of midazolam. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 4:01 am
’” Richard Wolf reports for USA Today that the court “re-entered the national debate over the influence of money in politics Monday by vacating a lower court decision that upheld Alaska’s low campaign contribution limits. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:19 am
Benisek v. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 9:56 am
HSBC BANK USA, N.A. v CRUM No. 3:14-CV-3522-B USDC Tex. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 5:46 pm
Wolf, 443 U.S. 595, 602 (1979). [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 6:52 am
” Richard Wolf of USA Today reports that the nation’s “powerful public employee unions stand to lose membership, money and political muscle at the hands of the Supreme Court this year. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 4:03 am
Subscript offers a graphic explainer for Class v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 5:41 am
Alabama and Jackson v. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 4:10 pm
Newspapers Journalism and Regulation Ofcom has opened an investigation into an episode of Mark Steyn’s 4 October programme on GB News after it received 411 complaints from viewers about comments made by author and journalist Dr Naomi Wolf in relation to Covid-19 vaccines. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 4:37 am
But when “the existence of damage is certain, and the only uncertainty is as to its amount, the plaintiff will not be denied recovery”; the defendant may not insist upon “theoretical perfection”; and it is “always the breaching party who must shoulder the burden of the uncertainty regarding the amount of damages” (Wathne Imports, Ltd. v PRL USA, Inc., 101 AD3d 83 [1st Dept 2012] [quotations omitted]). [read post]
