Search for: "United States v. Ali"
Results 541 - 560
of 755
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2013, 7:34 am
This was evident in a decision in November by the Eleventh Circuit in United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2014, 6:55 am
Following the recent filing of a petition for rehearing en banc by the detainees in the Allaithi v. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 9:00 am
United States, a case regarding damages under the Federal Tort Claims Act. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 7:22 pm
Id. at 46 (citing Toledo v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 8:41 pm
ALI SESAY, et.al., Case No. 10-457 (SDNY.) [read post]
29 May 2016, 9:09 am
When we last spoke for the United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 7:13 am
Yet another case: U.S. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 3:58 am
United States, in which legendary boxer Muhammad Ali appealed the rejection of his application for conscientious objector status at the height of the Vietnam War”; Justice Sonia Sotomayor presided, and “Justice Clarence Thomas, who sometimes seems bored on the bench, watched raptly from a spectator’s seat. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 4:57 pm
The National Security Communications Unit is said to be dedicated to “combating disinformation by state actors and others. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 7:59 am
Discussion of the Citizens United decision continues. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 8:28 am
After all the disclosures about surveillance on foreign leaders, Ashley did some digging through the publicly available documents and treaties, and she is pretty sure there is no legally binding “no spy” agreement between the United States and other countries. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 10:43 am
In United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 2:24 am
United States Associated Press reports on a motion filed by Amber Heard to dismiss the libel action brought by her ex husband, Johnny Depp. [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 11:42 am
Well, actually, no.United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 9:26 am
Quinta Jurecic posted the Lawfare Podcast: Goldsmith v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 2:13 pm
If there is reason to believe that the receiving state is going to detain John Doe under the direction and control of the United States—that is, if there’s reason to believe the transfer is a sham to perpetuate U.S. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 2:37 pm
AE 144: Government Notice of Ongoing Command Investigation (Legal Bins) The 9/11 session will follow another hearing in the other Guantanamo capital case, United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 5:35 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 3:54 pm
Additionally, we will be interested to see whether and how the revised policy addresses two key cases that have come down since 2009: the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s 2013 decision in U.S. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:08 am
Still, questions remain.In Samantar v. [read post]
