Search for: "United States v. Apple, Inc."
Results 541 - 560
of 922
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2013, 1:21 pm
Regardless, however, the Regulations state that for purposes of calculating these numbers, retirees and beneficiaries continuing coverage under the group medical coverage continuation rules generally count. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 12:58 pm
Brinker Affirms Continued Vitality of Wage and Hour Class Actions Oil refinery workers and ConocoPhillips Co. settled meal break claims for $15 million in United Steelworkers v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 3:29 pm
Noah Kravitz), LinkedIn (Eagle v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 3:29 pm
Noah Kravitz), LinkedIn (Eagle v. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 2:43 am
The Apple-Samsung award needs to be adjusted here and there, but the CMU-Marvell award must simply be tossed or slashed in order to protect the innovation economy against patent unreasonableness.The cross-appeal of Judge Posner's Apple v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 11:50 am
The case is Presidio Components v. [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 9:05 pm
Apple, Inc., No. 10-CV-2618-H (KSC), 2012 U.S. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 2:38 am
” Virginia: As the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia recently made clear in JTH Tax, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 1:08 pm
California) United States of America v. eBay, Inc., (US District Court, N.D. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 1:08 pm
California) United States of America v. eBay, Inc., (US District Court, N.D. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 3:59 pm
Apple Inc. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 3:59 pm
Apple Inc. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 3:54 am
Compiled from online public domain resources, provided for your review/use is this week's update of key industry news, views, and events highlighting key electronic discovery related stories, developments, and announcements.For a live daily view of industry news, click here for the Vendor Clips Live News Feed.Follow @InfoGovernanceeDiscovery News Content and ConsiderationsCourt Orders Retention of Outside Vendor to Collect Responsive Documents, Investigate Possible Spoliation –… [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 1:21 pm
Apple Inc., 672 F. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
” As support, it then stated, “In Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
The Supreme Court rejected this argument, saying, “the mere fact that a copyright is property derived from a grant by the United States is insufficient to support the claim of exemption.” To be exempt from state taxation, the government must reserve some sort of controlling interest in a grant or privilege. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 1:23 pm
Apple, Inc.) [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 9:00 am
Apple has yet to respond to the motion. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 5:58 am
Given Apple's victory, it is likely that Apple will continue to press its offensive throughout the globe, particularly in the United States. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 7:00 am
I’ve spent the last few weeks paying close attention to, examining, and writing about the just concluded Apple, Inc. v. [read post]
