Search for: "United States v. Booker"
Results 541 - 560
of 850
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2018, 12:51 pm
Booker, Johnson v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 1:45 pm
Sentencing Guidelines are merely advisory, not mandatory, see United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 1:45 pm
Sentencing Guidelines are merely advisory, not mandatory, see United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 1:45 pm
Sentencing Guidelines are merely advisory, not mandatory, see United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2005, 4:10 pm
See United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 1:08 pm
A little more than six years ago, in United States v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 2:22 pm
Sentencing Commission, 2007 Sourcebook of Federal Sentencing Statistics Tables Sentencing Memorandum in United States v. [read post]
21 May 2009, 6:40 pm
How has the advisory nature of the federal sentencing guidelines after the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 12:18 am
Here is the abstract: Despite the Supreme Court's 2005 decision in United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 9:52 am
United States, No. 13-10026. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 6:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 7:10 am
In light of the five-year anniversary of the Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 7:23 am
Finally, he requests that he be resentenced pursuant to the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 9:11 pm
In United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2008, 11:20 am
Furthermore, the issue for which the en banc court was convened is presently before the Supreme Court, see United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 7:07 am
This court upheld Smith's conviction and sentence in 2004, but the Supreme Court vacated his sentence in light of United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 10:09 pm
The one good thing about this case, is that it obliquely cites a case with a cool name: United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 9:48 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 3:19 pm
23 Jun 2010, 1:50 pm
Although the Court held a few years ago in United States v. [read post]
