Search for: "United States v. Borders"
Results 541 - 560
of 4,089
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2019, 8:49 am
Respondent and JINC entered the United States on July 14, 2017, via the land border between the United States and Mexico and they arrived in Nashville, Tennessee on July 29, 2017. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 5:19 am
An introduction to Fundamental Rights as Constraints on State Power in the United States --Washington v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 7:09 am
Secretary of State for Defence, and Smith v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 12:29 pm
District Judge in Seattle ruled that transporting and reselling unaltered “Trader Joe’s” branded products in Canada does not give rise to a lawsuit for trademark infringement in the United States under U.S. trademark laws. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 9:18 am
Here is a brief discussion of two of them:United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:27 pm
Hagen, 44 U.S. 212, 230 (1845), holds that when a new state is admitted to the Union it gains “the same rights, sovereignty and jurisdiction in that behalf as the original states possess within their respective borders,” Phillips Petroleum Co. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 3:45 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 3:39 pm
” On its own terms, Judge Robart’s decision applied “on a nationwide basis . . . all United States borders and ports of entry. [read post]
28 May 2014, 1:28 pm
The dog alerted to their vehicle, and Customs and Border Protection officers conducted a search. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 7:07 pm
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v Seljan, October 23, 2008, upheld federal officials seizure of the defendant's letters during a routine search. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 1:50 pm
The last time I recall this occurring was in 2005 when the United States Supreme Court held in Kelo v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 1:50 pm
The last time I recall this occurring was in 2005 when the United States Supreme Court held in Kelo v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 6:10 pm
Thus, as petitioner contends and respondent does not contest, the United States is the only Nation that imposes life without parole sentences on juvenile nonhomicide offenders. [read post]
13 Jun 2021, 5:18 pm
The court in this Ruffing case noted that the United States Supreme Court decision in Bauman would become virtually meaningless if a state could mandate the exercise of general personal jurisdiction over every entity that did business within its border simply because that company had registered to do business in the state. [read post]
25 May 2021, 4:00 am
The court in this Ruffing case noted that the United States Supreme Court decision in Bauman would become virtually meaningless if a state could mandate the exercise of general personal jurisdiction over every entity that did business within its border simply because that company had registered to do business in the state. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 1:25 am
UNITED KINGDOM BREXIT UPDATE The UK and the EU reached a deal that, from 1 January 2021, governs key aspects of the trade relationship between the two parties. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 1:09 pm
Legislation - 118th Congress Bulletinhttp://narf.org/nill/bulletins/legislation/118_uslegislation.html S.4558 - A bill to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act with respect to the right of members of a federally recognized Indian Tribe in the United States and First Nations individuals in Canada to cross the borders of the United States. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 4:35 pm
The courts in the United States do not recognize the "well-known mark" basis for relief (but see Grupo Gigante v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 6:13 am
Justice Anthony Kennedy opened oral arguments in Zivitofsky v. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 7:46 am
United State District Judge Thomas W. [read post]
