Search for: "United States v. Choice"
Results 541 - 560
of 6,594
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2012, 8:11 am
In State v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 7:52 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2022, 11:10 am
Download this Insight (PDF) Access the code and data (GitHub repository) Introduction The majority decision in Humane Society of the United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 11:05 am
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:32 am
At this blog, Marty Lederman discusses the impact of last week’s decision in United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
The United States District Court in Norfolk handed down an interesting decision this week in Senture, LLC v. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 8:00 am
The contract clause of the United States Constitution restricts the power of states to disrupt contractual arrangements. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 1:34 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 11:41 am
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (Tribal Contract Health; Discovery) United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 6:03 pm
United States and Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 1:08 pm
If these bills are enacted, federal judges in Texas will have a choice. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 12:05 pm
Dept. of the Navy v. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 10:18 am
State v. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 1:36 pm
(Tribal Lending; Arbitration; Choice-of-Law Provision) Garfield County, et al. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 9:18 am
Ganpat v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 10:30 am
The Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court, John Roberts remarked, "this is the strangest statute I have ever seen. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 1:26 pm
In Harm v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 6:30 am
The complaint (full text) in Evans v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 9:04 am
The United States is vested with full authority to bring an action for reimbursement, not the Secretary. 42 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 9:30 pm
United States v Windsor challenges the denial of federal benefits for gay couples under the Defense of Marriage Act [DOMA].As many as 17 states have filed amicus briefs in opposition to gay marriage. [read post]
