Search for: "United States v. Clinton"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,477
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
Can you do what the Framers imagined and hoped (against hope) United States’ leaders would do: serve the people and the higher good? [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
As the unanimous Court said in the 1974 Watergate Case, United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 11:56 am
Chris Winkelman is general counsel to the National Republican Congressional Committee, which filed an amicus brief in support of the state appellants in Gill v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
First, in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 12:52 pm
United States, 561 U.S. 358 (2010). [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 3:25 am
” That memo cites a quote from an 1882 Supreme Court decision, United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 9:30 pm
In his view, any acting official is exercising the power of “Officers of the United States” without going through the requirements imposed by the Appointments Clause of the Constitution. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 11:00 am
” The Constitution provides that the president, like the vice president and all civil officers of the United States, “shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 8:52 pm
United States. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 10:40 am
The President’s own spokesman, Sean Spicer, has stated that the posts of the President on @realDonaldTrump should be “considered official statements by the President of the United States. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 7:24 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 10:18 am
If a Slovakian college student who is studying in the United States called the Clinton campaign with such information, that would be a crime. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 5:57 am
Finally, “embarrass” means “to cause to experience a state of self-conscious distress. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
In its 2012 ruling in United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 1:41 pm
United States, in which the court on political question grounds affirmed dismissal of a suit seeking damages in relation to a 2012 drone strike in Yemen. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 2:18 pm
United States and Microsoft v. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 4:57 am
., United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 9:30 am
In Matal v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 11:23 am
Under a Supreme Court case dating back to 1990, also arising in Mexico, the Fourth Amendment does not protect noncitizens located outside the United States, unless they have some pre-existing substantial, voluntary connection to the United States. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 10:16 am
Writing for the majority in Maslenjak v. [read post]
