Search for: "United States v. Congress Construction Co."
Results 541 - 560
of 690
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2009, 4:29 am
Congress has said so. 44 U.S.C. [read post]
Symposium: The Supreme Court recognizes but limits disparate impact in its Fair Housing Act decision
26 Jun 2015, 5:58 am
Duke Power Co. and Smith v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 7:28 pm
In 2016 the United States Government published its first National Action Plan on Responsible Business Conduct. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
: RealNetworks, Mattel and Hasbro copy the infringer by creating online Scrabble: (IP ThinkTank), Creative Commons Statement of Intent for Attribution-Share Alike Licenses released: (creativecommons.org) Events IP Business Congress – 25-26 June, Amsterdam: (IP Business Congress), INTA annual meeting – 17-21 May, Berlin: (IMPACT), Australia: IPRIA / CELRL / IP Australia: Employees’ IP and the employment relationship –… [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 5:04 am
” How then is it possible that the Department of Commerce in these cases received Chevron deference given that the modern caselaw on Chevron—in particular, United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am
Activ8-3D (EPLAW) EWPCC deals with unregistered designs: Access plus inspiration need not mean copying: Albert Packaging v Nampak (Class 99) (IPKat) United States US Patent Reform Patent Reform Update: Will the House pass America Invents Act? [read post]
13 May 2011, 1:28 pm
However, Article 9 does not apply to the extent that a statute, regulation, or treaty of the United States preempts it. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:37 am
., v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
" (3)However, some nations such as the United States of America (USA) and the United Kingdom (UK) have at points sought to make methods of execution less liable to bungling or to inflicting gratuitous suffering. [read post]
9 May 2008, 10:30 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Order to transfer myspace.co.uk to MySpace overturned: (Out-Law), (IMPACT), New branding scheme for Ethiopian coffees: (Afro-IP), (IP finance), (IPKat), USPTO to appeal Tafas/GSK v Dudas: (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (PLI), (Patent Baristas), (Managing Intellectual Property), (IP Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Ladas & Parry),… [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am
Claiborne Hardware Co. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
: (IP finance), MARQUES international advertising portal goes live: (Class 46) Global - Patents Using patent landscaping analytics to improve the quality of M & A decisions: a review of Cox Enterprises’ $300M purchase of Adify: (IP Asset Maximiser Blog), Universities reap royalty rewards; investors ignore IP at their peril: (IAM), Top IP-owning nations claim faster patent processing; near harmonisation deal: (Intellectual Property Watch), Bosch, Xerox and Dupont sign up… [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 1:30 pm
The answer was easy: “The United States must lead by the power of our example and not by the example of our power. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 3:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:24 am
Its purpose is to "monitor, investigate, and submit to congress an annual report on the national security implications of the bilateral trade and economic relationship between the United States and the People’s Republic of China, and to provide recommendations, where appropriate, to Congress for legislative and administrative action. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 7:28 am
In Branch v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 5:16 pm
In the United States, copyright in a screen display can be claimed in connection with the registration of a copyright claim in the software program. [read post]
25 May 2022, 5:16 pm
In the United States, copyright in a screen display can be claimed in connection with the registration of a copyright claim in the software program. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:24 pm
He focuses on Justice Stevens' and Scalia's dissents in the dismissal of the certified question in United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm
The Court held that states, such as Colorado, do not have the power to enforce this provision because the Constitution gives Congress that authority. [read post]
