Search for: "United States v. District Court" Results 541 - 560 of 38,529
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2013, 3:01 pm
The United States District Court for the Southern Division of Maryland in Greenbelt issued its first ruling Friday granting a defense motion to suppress a warrantless blood test as a result of the Supreme Court decision in Missouri v. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 8:48 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT EAST BAY SANCTUARY COVENANT, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 6:08 am by Emma Svoboda
Section 3231 grants federal district courts “original jurisdiction, exclusive of the courts of the States, of all offenses against the laws of the United States. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 6:00 am by Andrew Thomas
Valve Corp United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Filed November 29, 2018, Case No. 2:18-cv-01717-BJR On November 29, 2018, Hillside Licensing LLC […] [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 4:14 am
Waterdrop also pointed to FRCP 45(a)(3), which states that an attorney may authorize and issue a subpoena if authorized to practice in the issuing court. 35 USC Section 24 states that "the clerk of any United States court for the district wherein testimony is to be taken for use in any contested case in the Patent and Trademark Office shall, upon the application of any party thereto, issue a subpoena for any witness residing… [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 8:40 am by Daniel Sullivan
Plaintiff filed a Jones Act complaint in United States District Court, Northern District of Mississippi. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 1:26 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 2:39 pm
In United States v.Conrad Clinton Blair, No. 12-4427, the Court rejects an expansive reading of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Descamps v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 1:19 pm by Tom Casagrande
§ 145"An applicant dissatisfied with the decision of the [BPAI] may, unless appeal has been taken to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, have remedy by civil action against the Director in the United States District Court . . . . [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 6:04 pm
Eleven months after ruling that taxing damage awards for nonphysical compensatory damages violated the United States Constitution, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has reversed itself in Murphy v. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 7:17 am by MBettman
 But the Supreme Court of Ohio found the reasoning in United States v. [read post]