Search for: "United States v. Drew"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,387
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2017, 1:43 pm
Recently, in Karlo v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 1:10 am
It noted that the problem of deciding the Court’s temporal jurisdiction had been considered with varying results in previous cases, notably Blecic v Croatia (2006) 43 E.H.R.R. 48, Moldovan v Romania (2007) 44 E.H.R.R. 16, Balasoiu v Romania (App. no. 37424/97), 2 September 2003, and Kholodova v Russia (App. no. 30651/05), 14 September 2006. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 6:00 pm
United States, 547 U.S. 715 (2006). [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 6:10 pm
And finally, we have a revised opinion in United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:36 pm
” As I explained in an earlier post, Congress intended RFRA to incorporate by reference the Supreme Court’s Free Exercise Clause jurisprudence from the era preceding Employment Division v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Such racial cleansings and establishment of “sundown towns” happened across the United States. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 11:16 am
Maine (an earlier state sovereign immunity case) and District of Columbia v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 1:38 am
Here is Kim’s guest post: This week, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in Erica P. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 6:35 am
It did not specifically target U.S. customers but ran a globally accessible website, was aware that some of its customers were from the United States, and drew income from the United States that the court described as “not insubstantial. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 4:10 am
United States, in which the court held on Monday that a decision not to grant a proportional sentence reduction does not require a detailed written explanation. [read post]
In Defence of the Triple Test: A Case for Retaining the Standard in Bangalore Water Supply (Part-II)
25 Nov 2016, 12:23 pm
Looking beyond India, the majority opinion of the United States Supreme Court in Planned Parenthood v Casey[9] had, while examining a plea for reconsideration of Roe v Wade[10], had presented before itself the following questions: a) whether the central rule had been found unworkable; b) whether the rule could be removed without serious inequity to those who had relied upon it; c) whether thecentral rule had become a doctrinal anachronism; and… [read post]
In Defence of the Triple Test: A Case for Retaining the Standard in Bangalore Water Supply (Part-II)
25 Nov 2016, 12:23 pm
Looking beyond India, the majority opinion of the United States Supreme Court in Planned Parenthood v Casey[9] had, while examining a plea for reconsideration of Roe v Wade[10], had presented before itself the following questions: a) whether the central rule had been found unworkable; b) whether the rule could be removed without serious inequity to those who had relied upon it; c) whether thecentral rule had become a doctrinal anachronism; and… [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:00 am
Jack reflected on the significance of military commissions, particularly in light of some of last week’s events in the United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 9:20 am
“[United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 10:20 am
Supreme Court first opened the door to random checkpoints in 1976, when it ruled in United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 1:24 pm
(The United States, arguing as an amicus in support of Shauers, did not draw any questions at all.) [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 11:28 am
Solicitor General Noel Francisco argued the case on behalf of the United States. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 7:04 am
In United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 11:18 am
KWV, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 8:22 am
Universal Electric Corp. v. [read post]
