Search for: "United States v. Dutch"
Results 541 - 560
of 768
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2012, 5:17 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., 226 F.3d 88, 91-92 (2d Cir. 2000); Beanal v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 2:16 am
Can any Dutch-speaker come to the Kat's rescue and summarise it? [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 9:04 am
On December 22, 2011, the Department of Labor’s Administrative Review Board (ARB) issued a 3-2 en banc decision that limits the application of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) outside of the United States. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 6:33 am
Kiobel v. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 11:55 am
Department of State, has the following analysis of the International Court of Justice’s decision Friday in Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 2:44 pm
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., scheduled for argument later this month. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:55 pm
The English speaking Caribbean inherited much of its cultural norms and its legal system from the British colonizers, so that just like the United States, it has a common law system which is a direct descendant of the English common law system and some of the countries still have close ties to the British since they retain the Privy council as their final court of appeal, others have opted to have the newly created Caribbean Court of Justice as their final Court of Appeal. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:55 pm
The English speaking Caribbean inherited much of its cultural norms and its legal system from the British colonizers, so that just like the United States, it has a common law system which is a direct descendant of the English common law system and some of the countries still have close ties to the British since they retain the Privy council as their final court of appeal, others have opted to have the newly created Caribbean Court of Justice as their final Court of Appeal. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:53 pm
The English speaking Caribbean inherited much of its cultural norms and its legal system from the British colonizers, so that just like the United States, it has a common law system which is a direct descendant of the English common law system and some of the countries still have close ties to the British since they retain the Privy council as their final court of appeal, others have opted to have the newly created Caribbean Court of Justice as their final Court of Appeal. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 2:24 am
The present article analyses the reception of the ECJ cases by courts of the member states. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 3:11 pm
On December 12, 2011, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari to resolve this issue. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 4:31 pm
A separate case was filed in the United States, but the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, but that court dismissed the case on forum non conveniens grounds in 2002, a decision that was upheld by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 12:33 am
Taking into account both federal and state lawsuit filings, M&A-related lawsuits now outnumber federal securities lawsuit filings and M&A-related litigation is now the lawsuit of choice for many plaintiffs’ securities attorneys. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 6:53 am
Yup, the United States Supreme Court decided two cases on our top ten list on the same day. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 7:11 am
United States, and its two Eighth Amendment juvenile life-without-parole cases, Miller v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:15 pm
As previously reported here, the United States Supreme Court recently granted certiorari in the case of Kiobel v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 6:35 am
United States. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 12:22 am
However, last year, in an abrupt reversal, the United States Supreme Court dramatically limited the extraterritorial application of U.S. securities laws in Morrison v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 9:15 am
United States, continued to keep Court watchers and commentators busy yesterday. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
’[3] On the question of domestic law the Court finds that ‘the law of the United States has been uniform since its founding that corporations can be held liable for the torts committed by their agents. [read post]
