Search for: "United States v. FEDERAL COMPANY" Results 541 - 560 of 12,463
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2014, 8:00 am by Lauren Bateman
”  The Presidential order stopped the deal, ordered Ralls to divest, and gave federal agents access to all Ralls facilities in the United States in order to perform inspections. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 6:39 am by Nassiri Law
Dep’t of Defense, December 7, 2015, United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit More Blog Entries: Arlington v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 12:00 am by Mark Meyer
Constitution, which states “This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof ... shall be the supreme law of the land. [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 5:00 am by Andy
This follows a number of landmark cases including Wheaton v Peters 33 US (8 Pet) 591, 668 (1834), Banks & Bros v West Publishing Co 27 F 50 (CCD) Minn, 1886, right up to the case of the State of Georgia v The Harrison Company 548 F Supp 110 (N d Ga 1982). [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:37 pm by Brian D. Moore
Fox Searchlight Pictures Inc., 11 Civ 6784 (WHP) United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 3:00 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit decided the case of United States of America, e ex rel. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 1:28 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
” This Directive, which is the foundational legal document for all cybersecurity policies in the United States, evidences government efforts to enlist private sector companies, more broadly monitor Internet activity, and develop offensive cybersecurity capability. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 3:33 pm by Eric Schweibenz
Ltd., Ninestar Technology Company Ltd., and Town Sky Inc. [read post]
8 Mar 2014, 7:19 am by Mark Murakami
Can a state require a company to obtain permission to operate a vessel/business on a federal navigable waterway without violating the U.S. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 9:05 am by Thomas Dillickrath and Molly Lorenzi
On March 10, 2020, the United States District Court for the District of Arizona issued a tentative ruling denying Axon Enterprise’s motion for preliminary injunction and dismissing its complaint against the Federal Trade Commission, due to lack of subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
24 May 2013, 12:26 pm by Sheldon Toplitt
., joined by 10 other plaintiffs, has sued Alki David's Aereokiller LLC and FilmOn.TV in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia to stop unlicensed online streaming of commercial television programming. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 2:44 pm by Steve Bainbridge
This understanding of Dirks was implicitly confirmed by the Supreme Court’s more recent decision in United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 9:40 am by Jason Rantanen
By Jason Rantanen Nazomi Communications, Inc. v. [read post]