Search for: "United States v. Harris" Results 541 - 560 of 2,750
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2020, 10:45 am
Sullivan, 446 U.S. 335 (1980); and a third based on United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which stems from the “Bridgegate” controversy in New Jersey and involves the extent to which federal fraud statutes cover the politically motivated acts of public officials, for this blog, in a post that first appeared at Howe on the Court. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
United States New York state’s highest court will consider whether U.S. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 5:30 am by Kevin
APRIL Apr. 1: Texas sources report that Harris County Judge Bill McLeod has accidentally resigned from office. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 7:55 am
  This was also the year of the rise of the core of leadership--in Turkey, Russia, China, the United States, Germany, and France. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
Department of Justice and was an assistant to the Solicitor General of the United States. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 6:54 am by Jonathan H. Adler
United States (striking down the federal Defense of Marriage Act), and Obergefell v. [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 9:05 pm by News Desk
Silliker Lecturer is selected by a committee including a representative from Merieux NutriSciences, the Program Committee Chairperson, and the IAFP President.2019 Recipient: Robert V. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 5:43 pm by Samuel Bray
This chapter starts with Maitland on equity's development, sketches the American history, addresses the formative idea of equity acting in personam, and covers the current state of the fusion of law and equity in the United States. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
"In making the decision [whether to seal], the court should consider less restrictive 'alternatives to sealing [that] provide an adequate record for review' and should 'state the reasons for its decision [with] specific findings.'" United States v. [read post]