Search for: "United States v. Job"
Results 541 - 560
of 8,281
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2008, 2:40 pm
The decision in a recent federal court case against the United States Library of Congress shows clearly the risk an employer takes when making employment decisions based on a person’s gender identity. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 10:18 am
State v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 10:20 am
On June 25, 2009, the United States Supreme Court ruled in the seaman's favor! [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 10:20 am
On June 25, 2009, the United States Supreme Court ruled in the seaman's favor! [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 7:37 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 4:57 am
The defense does not agree that United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 1:13 pm
After just under three years (and three Supreme Court terms) on the job, Noel Francisco announced today that he would step down as the solicitor general of the United States, effective July 3, 2020. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
Taylor Law amended to clarify an employee organization's duty of fair representation of non-members in a collective bargaining unit Section 209-a.2 of the Civil Service LawIn Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448, the Supreme Court held that "States and public-sector unions may no longer extract agency fees from nonconsenting employees. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
Taylor Law amended to clarify an employee organization's duty of fair representation of non-members in a collective bargaining unit Section 209-a.2 of the Civil Service LawIn Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448, the Supreme Court held that "States and public-sector unions may no longer extract agency fees from nonconsenting employees. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 7:13 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 6:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 6:44 am
In United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:15 pm
United States and Ashcroft v. al-Kidd (used with permission, www.courtartist.com) How should citizens in a republic bound by the rule of law regard the pretextual use of law by state officials? [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 3:07 pm
United States Ex Rel. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 11:10 am
(Orin Kerr) The Onion has a story that begins: WASHINGTON—The justices of the United States Supreme Court confirmed this week that although he has been on the job less than a year, their new agent, Rory McCleft, has already started to help the nine-member panel land more high-profile cases. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 5:57 am
” Watson v. [read post]
18 Sep 2012, 5:04 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 9:00 am
Failure to include a "mitigation specialist" in a death penalty case is arguably per se ineffective assistance of counsel, violating the defendant’s rights under both the Sixth and Eighth Constitution according to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 2:55 pm
* United States Federal Trial Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/currentdct.htmSt. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 3:48 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
