Search for: "United States v. Kelly" Results 541 - 560 of 853
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by James Romoser
” Also on Tuesday, the court declined to intervene in a Montana dispute over whether Green Party candidates will be listed on the state’s November ballot, CNN’s Dan Berman and Caroline Kelly report. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 8:46 am by Don Cruse
Personal jurisdiction over corporate officers requires an allegation that they committed tortious acts connected Texas Dan Kelly and Laura Hofstatter v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm by Victoria Hawekotte
New Zealand, Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States had already banned the app. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
So while in 2012 ‘intrusion upon seclusion’ may have found favour with Whata J, this could be the fullest extent to which New Zealand courts adopt the United States’ Restatements torts (sourced from Harvard Law Professor William Prosser’s seminal 1960 article). [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 11:20 am by Colin Murray
Many of the cases which outlined the requirements of impartial investigation (like the Jordan case cited above, but including McKerr v United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, Kelly and Others v  United Kingdom, no. 30054/96 and Shanaghan v United Kingdom, no. 37715/97) involved the UK directly (and particularly its security operations in Northern Ireland). [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 12:39 pm by Giles Peaker
The building as defined included the commercial unit. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 6:58 pm by Lyle Denniston
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit — have interpreted the Supreme Court’s ruling last Term in United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 2:27 pm
  Perry v Truefitt, 49 ER 749 stated that ‘A man is not to sell his own goods under pretence that they are the goods of another man. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 5:45 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the June 13 conference)   Kelly v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 1:16 pm by Rebecca Yergin
In reaching this conclusion, the Commission’s Opinion initially decided that 1-800 Contacts’ settlements were not immune from antitrust review under FTC v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 3:24 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The Washington Post, Leah Litman writes that Kelly v. [read post]