Search for: "United States v. Levi" Results 541 - 560 of 1,042
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2010, 7:59 pm by Michael Atkins
If there is no in personam jurisdiction in any judicial district of the United States, the owner may proceed in rem against the allegedly infringing domain name. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 1:24 pm by Kiera Flynn
United States, which ran last month, we also plan to host symposia on the battle over the Defense of Marriage Act and Proposition 8, as well as the impact of recent class action and arbitration decisions at the Court. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 1:47 pm by Aaron Weems
 Domestic Relation Offices and the Pennsylvania State Collection and Disbursement Unit often preclude a payor from taking reduced support payments, and they will not issue a refund. [read post]
7 Oct 2018, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
United States On 3 October 2018 the Federal Emergency Management Agency conducted a nationwide test of the Wireless Emergency Alert system. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 1:36 am by Marie Louise
MOZIE section 2(d) opposition but nixes fraud claim (TTABlog)   US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Lawsuits and strategic steps Levi Strauss – Levi Strauss’s trademark and domain name claims may block unauthorized resales: Levi Strauss v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 7:46 am by Darien Shanske
Elaine Goldenberg, representing the United States, which filed an amicus brief in support of neither party, also disagreed with the state’s position on comparison class. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 6:29 pm by Vincent LoTempio
Recently HEATHCOTE HOLDINGS CORP, INC filed a complaint (.PDF) claiming false patent marking against CRAYOLA LLC in the United States District Court in the Northern District of Illinois. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 2:28 pm
Lebowitz The author is a Queens County Supreme Court justice. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OCA Not Proper Party In Judges' Pay Suit September 14, 2007 To the Editor, In the Law Journal on Sept. 11, page 2 (see below), the attorney for the judges who are petitioners in Maron v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 6:55 am by John Elwood
Under Article I of the Constitution as originally ratified, Congress could only levy “direct taxes” if such taxes were “apportioned among the several States,” meaning in proportion to their populations. [read post]