Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 541 - 560
of 9,468
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2018, 5:58 am
Applicant, United Trademark Holdings, Inc., filed for registration of the mark RAPUNZEL for dolls and toy figures. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 7:48 am
This phrase, as well as its accompanying ‘Walking Fingers’ logo, are registered trade marks in many countries around the world, including the UK, Canada, and Australia – though curiously not the United States. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:06 am
United States; Plessy v. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 6:35 pm
In a forum that has taken pains to praise United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 12:39 pm
Chicago, Illinois - The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed the ruling of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Western Division in the matter of Sorenson v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 5:59 am
§ 292, was unconstitutional under the Take Care Clause in Article II of the United States Constitution. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 4:15 pm
To apply United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 3:26 am
Lacteos de Honduras S.A. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:48 pm
The title of the article is The Quiet Coup, and it's introductory paragraph changed my whole year… The crash has laid bare many unpleasant truths about the United States. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 4:38 am
" DuPont factors two and three: The Board improperly discounted the evidence that "COGNAC certified product has an intimate and legendary history with music, particularly rap music and hip-hop music, in the United States. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 10:52 am
In Interprofession du Gruyere v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 6:18 am
Today marks the first in a week-long hearing in the military commission case of United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 5:43 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 2:00 am
United States. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:56 am
Today marks the first of a possibly three-day, pre-trial motions hearing in the military commission case of United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 5:40 am
This marks the third day of this week’s four-day motions session in United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 6:03 am
A little programming note here, y’all: today marks the first of a two-day, pre-trial hearing in the military commission case of United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 9:11 am
Clontech Labs, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 12:59 pm
The false marking statute includes a bounty hunter (i.e., qui tam) provision providing that “[a]ny person may sue for the penalty, in which event one-half shall go to the person suing and the other to the use of the United States. [read post]
